SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 460

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Mathur, J
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 775 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Bheru Lal Jat, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

Bail can be granted based on parity with co-accused, provided there is no risk of the accused influencing witnesses or fleeing justice.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 483 - Bail application filed for offences under IPC Sections 452, 341, 342, 323, 307, 395, and 397 - Co-accused persons have been granted bail, and the present petitioner’s case is not distinguishable from theirs - The prosecution did not demonstrate any risk of the petitioner influencing witnesses or fleeing justice. (Paras 3, 6, 7)

(B) Judicial custody - The petitioner has been in judicial custody, and the trial is expected to take a long time - The court finds prima facie grounds for granting bail. (Paras 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with a specific FIR for multiple IPC offences and sought bail on the grounds of parity with co-accused who were granted bail.

Findings of Court:
The court finds no distinction between the petitioner and co-accused who were granted bail and sees no risk of the petitioner influencing witnesses or fleeing.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail based on the similarity of circumstances with co-accused who have been released.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes the principle of parity in bail applications, noting that the prosecution failed to establish any apprehension regarding the petitioner’s potential actions post-release.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.132/2024 registered at Police Station Maulasar, District Deedwana-Kuchaman, for the offences under Sections 452, 341, 342, 323, 307, 395 and 397 of IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the co- accused persons namely Sonu (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.12303/2024), Rajendra Meena (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.14668/2024) and Jitendra Burdak @ Jitu (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13572/2024) have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 07.10.2024 and 02.12.2024. Learned counsel further submitted that case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the above named co-accused persons who have already been enlarged on bail.

4. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; the challan has already been filed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the above name co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, this Court prima facie finds that the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the above named co-accused persons who have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and co-ordinate Bench of this Court. This Court also prima facie finds that the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner influencing the material prosecution witnesses or fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail.

7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Suresh Kumar S/o Ladu Ram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.132/2024 registered at Police Station Maulasar, District Deedwana-Kuchaman, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top