SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 678

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI, J.
Lakhan - Appellant
Versus
 Jagdish - Respondent
CRLMP / 1293 / 2025
Decided On : 17-02-2025

The court modified the appellate order, reducing the deposit requirement from 20% to 10% of the cheque amount, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court precedents.

Headnote:

(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 430 - Modification of appellate court's order regarding deposit of fine - The petitioner challenged the appellate court's order requiring a 20% deposit of the fine amount, arguing it was not mandatory as per Supreme Court precedent. The court modified the order, reducing the deposit requirement to 10% and extending the deadline for payment. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Legal principles - The court emphasized the importance of adhering to Supreme Court rulings regarding conditions for suspension of sentence. (Paras 4-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and sought suspension of sentence, which was initially granted with a 20% deposit condition.

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the petitioner's argument and modified the deposit requirement to 10%.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellate court could impose a deposit condition for suspension of sentence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the imposition of a 20% deposit was not imperative, aligning with Supreme Court guidance.

Result: The petition was allowed in part, modifying the deposit requirement.

ORDER :

(FARJAND ALI, J.)

1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 19.12.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.3, Udaipur (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the appellate court’) in Criminal Appeal No.634/2024, whereby the application under Section 430 of BNSS filed by the petitioner was allowed with the condition to deposit 20% of fine amount within 1 month.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material as made available to this Court as well as the order under assail.

3. Bereft of elaborate details, briefly stated facts of the case are that the petitioner was tried and convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act vide judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, N.I. Act Cases No.06, Udaipur (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the trial court’). Aggrieved of the judgment of conviction, he preferred an appeal before the learned appellate court along with an application under Section 430 of BNSS for suspension of sentence awarded by the learned trial court. Vide the order under assail dated 19.12.2024, the learned appellate court allowed the application under Section 430 of the BNSS with the condition of depositing 20% of the fine amount within 1 month as directed by the learned trial court.

4. The grief of the petitioner would be that in view of the mandate of law and the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jamboo Bhandari Vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. reported (2023) 10 SCC 446, there is no need to direct the appellant to deposit 20% of the cheque amount as well as imposition of a condition for deposition of 20% of the cheque amount is not imperative and mandatory.

5. In view of the limited prayer, the legal provisions and the law enunciated in this regard by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, I deem it appropriate to make a slight modification in the order dated 19.12.2024.

6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed in part and the order dated 19.12.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.3, Udaipur in Criminal Appeal No.634/2024, is modified in the manner that now the petitioner would deposit 10% of the cheque amount instead of 20% of the cheque amount. He is given a further concession to deposit the same till 20.03.2025. The impugned order is modified to this extent.

7. The stay petition also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top