SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 693

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA, J
Sharwan Kumar S/o Shri Moti Lal, - Appellant
Versus
The Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jodhpur - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2938/2024
Decided On : 14-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Jitendra Singh Bhaleria, Mr. Manish Patel, Mr. R.S. Choudhary, Mr. Rajak Khan, Mr. Rakesh Matoria, Mr. Dixit Panwar, Mr. Vikas Bijarnia, Mr. Sandeep Bishnoi, Mr.Trilok Joshi, Manjeet, Mr. Devendra Singh Thind, Mr. Vikash Choudhary, Mr. S.R. Godara, Mr. Vipin Mankad, Mr. O.P. Sangwa, Mr. Mahendra Singh Godara, Mr. Manoj Bohra, Mr. S.R. Godara, Mr. Ratna Ram, Mr. Sunil Dhaka, Mr. Kunal Bishnoi, Mr. Harshvardhan Singh, Ms. Priyanka Kewaliya, Mr. S.K. Shrimali, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Mr. Himanshu Shrimali, O.P. Kumawat, Mr. S.K. Poonia, Mr. Sudhir Saruparia, Mr. Pradeep Singh Khosa, Mr. SKM Vyas.
For the Respondent: Mr. Pradeep Sharma Mr. Hukam Singh for Mr. Bhavit Sharma

Transfer orders violating established seniority rules and adversely affecting employee rights are unlawful, necessitating fresh orders that respect seniority and consider administrative exigencies.

Headnote:

(A) Rajasthan State Electricity Board (Technical Workmen) Service Regulations, 1975 - Transfer orders - Petitioners, unskilled/semi-skilled and skilled staff of two Power Distribution Companies, challenged mass transfers affecting their seniority and service conditions - Court found transfers violated service rules and adversely impacted seniority - Court emphasized that transfers should respect seniority jurisdiction and administrative exigencies must be balanced with employee rights. (Paras 1, 3, 14, 15)

(B) Administrative Law - Transfers - Transfers must not violate established seniority rules and should consider employee hardships - The court noted that the circular justifying transfers did not adequately protect employee rights. (Paras 3.1, 10, 14.1)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, employees of two Power Distribution Companies, challenged mass transfer orders that adversely affected their seniority and service conditions, arguing the transfers were carried out mechanically and without consideration of individual hardships.

Findings of Court:
The transfer orders were set aside, with directions to issue fresh orders that maintain seniority within the same division, considering administrative exigencies and employee rights.

Issues: The legality of transfer orders and their impact on seniority and service conditions of the petitioners were the main issues addressed by the court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the transfer orders violated the established seniority rules and emphasized the need for administrative decisions to balance operational needs with employee rights and hardships.

Result: Transfer orders set aside.

Table of Content
1. transfer orders set aside (Para 15)
2. transfers must respect seniority rules (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

ORDER :

(ARUN MONGA, J.)

1. Before this Court are, unskilled/semi-skilled and/or skilled (Category 'A' or 'B') staff members of the two Power Distribution Companies (discoms) operating in State of Rajasthan, i.e. Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (JVNL) and Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (AVNL). Vide instant order the entire bunch of above numbered petitions is being disposed of as same controversy is involved therein.

2. Common grievance being, that by virtue of mass transfers carried out by both the Discoms, the petitioners have not only been dislodged, but their service conditions have also been adversely changed qua inter-se seniority, which are to be maintained at Sub divisional/Divisional Level.

3. Given the nature of controversy, the individual facts in the various petitions need not be gone into.

3.1. What is assailed herein is the legality of the transfer orders being in alleged violation of the applicable service rules, as well as, the administrative impropriety of giving complete short shrift to even the deserving cases of extreme hardships which the petitioners would be confronted with.

3.2. Averment also is that the transfer exercise has been carried out in the most mechanical manner, which on the face of it, though may not be punitive, but unwittingly many of the employees would have to relocate themselves to very far off places. Notwithstanding, that they are on the bottom of the pyramid of the human resource deployed by Discoms. Thus, being at the entry level of pay-scales equivalent to those of either Class- IV or Class-III employee of their counterparts, who are serving in the State Government, they can financially ill afford to relocate their families and/or make housing arrangements for them.

4. At the very threshold, pertinent it is to note that the applicable service rules in both the Discoms are pari passu. Therefore, interpretation thereof would be applicable across board to both the discoms.

4.1. In fact, the service conditions vis-a-vis the applicable rules owe their genesis to the erstwhile parent organization, i.e., Rajasthan State Electricity Board. After enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003 , a trifurcation of Rajasthan State Electricity Board took place, by virtue of which it was unbundled into three entities, i.e. Power Generation, Power Transmission and Power Distribution (Discoms).

4.2. Prior to trifurcation, ibid, a Memorandum of Settlement, under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , was executed on 26.01.1970 between the then Rajasthan State Electricity Board and Prantiya Vidhyut Mandal Mazdoor Federation (which continues to be existing even as on today to serve the cause of staff of both discoms). Relevant extract i.e. Appendix 'B' of the Memorandum, ibid, reads as under:-

"APPENDIX 'B'

SUB: TRANSFERS OF TECHNICAL STAFF

1.The various categories of Technical Staff may be divided under the categories shown below together with the seniority jurisdiction wherein they are expected to work and which form the basis of their seniority and consequentially liable to be transferred within that jurisdiction.
Category of StaffSeniority Jurisdiction
1. Unskilled and semi Skilled technical staff.Sub Division
2. Skilled B and skilled A Technical staffDivision
3. Supervisory Technical staff upto the scale of pay identical to the scale of skilled A category (105-240)Circle
4. Remaining supervisory Technical staffBoard as a whole
2.Ordinarily no such employee should be transferred outside the seniority jurisdiction pertaining to him. Where, however it is found absolutely essential to transfer such a person outside the seniority jurisdiction, the transfer would be effected under the orders of the respective technical staff about below who would record in detail the reasons for such transfer in the file of the worker concerned:-
1. From one sub division to another sub division in the same divisionExecutive Engineer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top