SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 740

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA, J
National Insurance Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Smt. Anamika - Respondent
CMA / 3403 / 2024
Decided On : 20-02-2025

Advocates:
Mr. Santosh Choudhary, Mr. Mudit Vaishnav

The income of a deceased student in a motor accident claim must reflect actual earnings, not speculative figures.

Headnote:

(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court addressed the computation of income for a deceased student in a motor accident claim, emphasizing the need for accurate income assessment based on actual earnings rather than speculative figures. (Paras 1, 2, 6)

(B) Stay of Execution - The court granted a stay on the execution of the award pending the deposit of 70% of the award amount by the Insurance Company. (Paras 6, 10)

Facts of the case:
The deceased was a third-year MBBS student and was not earning at the time of the accident. The Tribunal erroneously computed his income at Rs. 50,000/- per month. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The court stayed the execution of the Tribunal's award, requiring the Insurance Company to deposit 70% of the award amount within six weeks. (Paras 6, 11)

Issues: The main issues were the accuracy of the income computation for the deceased and the implications of the stay on execution proceedings. (Paras 1, 6)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the income of a student should not be speculative and must reflect actual earnings, emphasizing the need for the Tribunal to reassess the income computation. (Paras 1, 2)

Result: Stay granted on execution of the award.

ORDER :

REKHA BORANA, J.

1. Learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company submits that the learned Tribunal erroneously computed the income of the deceased to be Rs. 50,000/- per month whereas admittedly the deceased was a student of MBBS 3rd year and was not earning anything on the date of accident.

2. Per contra, learned counsel appearing in caveat for respondent-claimants submits that the learned Tribunal rightly computed the income of the deceased while relying upon the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ashvinbhai Jayantilal Modi vs Ramkaran Ramchandra Sharma & Anr; 2015 (2) SCC 180 (decided on 25.09.2014).

3. In view of the submissions made, Admit. Issue notice.

Notices need not be issued to respondent-claimant Nos.1 & 2 as they are already represented by counsel.

4. At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, service on respondent Nos.3 and 4 is dispensed with at the risk of the appellant.

5. Heard on stay petition.

6. The effect, operation and execution of the impugned award dated 29.08.2024 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar in MAC Case No.47/2019 (CIS No.47/2019) shall remain stayed subject to the appellant-Insurance Company depositing 70% of the award amount (with interest) within a period of six weeks with the learned Tribunal. The amount already deposited, if any, shall be adjusted qua the amount to be deposited now. The amount when deposited be disbursed to the claimants in terms of the award.

7. Let the record be sent to this Court after disbursal of the amount.

8. Stay petition stands disposed of.

9. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the execution proceedings have been initiated by the claimants and the learned Tribunal has even issued the attachment order dated 18.01.2025 whereby the bank account of the head office of the appellant- Insurance Company has been attached. He prays that the said bank account of the Insurance Company be directed to be released so that the amount in pursuance to the present order can be deposited by the appellant-Insurance Company.

10. In view of the submission made, the learned Tribunal shall be under an obligation to pass appropriate orders to release the bank account of the appellant-Insurance Company from attachment, forthwith.

11. However, if 70% of the award amount (with interest) in pursuance to the present order is not deposited by the appellant- Insurance Company within the stipulated period, the learned Tribunal shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders again.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top