HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
SAWAI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1028 / 2025
ORDER :
KULDEEP MATHUR, J.
These applications for bail under Section 483 BNSS have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.14/2025 registered at Police Station Pilibanga, Dist. Hanumangarh, for the offences punishable under Sections 110, 115(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at Bar. Perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submitted that in the alleged incident which occurred on 06.01.2025, the injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioners upon the complainant- Laxmi Narayan with blunt weapons are simple in nature.
4. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody; the petitioners do not have any criminal antecedents and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.
5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications. Shri Hardik Gautam, the learned counsel for the complainant submitted that on the date of the alleged incident, the petitioners have inflicted injuries upon the injured person- Laxmi Narayan without there being any provocation from his side. It was submitted that looking to the seriousness of the allegations levelled against the present petitioner, he does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. However, learned counsels were not in a position to refute the fact that as per the case diary produced by the learned Public Prosecutor, the injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioners upon the injured person are simple in nature.
6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail applications filed by the petitioners deserve to be accepted.
7. Consequently, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Shrawan S/o Omprakash, (2) Jugal Kishore S/o Ganga Ram, (3) Sawai Singh S/o Sh. Arjun Singh and (4) Karan S/o Ganga Ram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.14/2025 registered at Police Station Pilibanga, Dist. Hanumangarh, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for their appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
9. A copy of this order be placed in each file.
Bail can be granted when allegations involve simple injuries, no criminal history exists, and trial duration is expected to be lengthy.
Bail can be granted even for serious allegations if the injuries are grievous but not life-threatening, and the investigation is complete.
Bail granted based on the nature of injuries and lengthy trial process, emphasizing that injuries are grievous but not life-threatening.
Bail may be granted when petitioners are not specifically named in the FIR and have no assigned role in the alleged crime, highlighting the discretionary nature of bail.
The court may grant bail if the nature of allegations is serious but injuries are minor, and there is no risk of influencing witnesses or fleeing.
The court emphasized that when co-accused are granted bail under similar circumstances, the same should apply to the petitioners, considering the lengthy trial duration.
Bail may be granted when injuries are grievous but not life-threatening, investigation is concluded, and no risk of influencing witnesses is present.
The court granted bail based on the nature of injuries being simple and the completion of the investigation, with no risk of influencing witnesses.
The court granted bail based on the non-life-threatening nature of the injuries and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the importance of trial duration in bail considerations.
Bail may be granted if the accused is in judicial custody, the trial will take a long time, and there is no risk of influencing witnesses.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.