SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 747

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
AMRIT LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. J.V.S. Deora, Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

This application for bail under Section 483 of BNS S (439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.148/2024 registered at Police Station Parsad, District Salumber, for offences under Sections 137(2), 126(2), 115(2), 3(5), 331(6) and 117(2) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at Bar. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the alleged incident, which occurred on 30.11.2024, the injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioners upon the injured- Manju Devi are though grievous in nature but the same are not dangerous to life.

4. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody; challan has already been filed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioners upon the injured- Manju Devi are though grievous in nature but the same are not dangerous to life.

6. H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top