SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 751

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
BHANWAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1401 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

Bail may be granted when the accused is not a flight risk, and the injuries caused are grievous but not life-threatening.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - The petitioner, an Ex-Army personnel, arrested for offences under Sections 329(3), 109(1), and 118(2) of BNS and Sections 3/25 and 7/27 of Arms Act, claimed false implication due to animosity with the complainant. The injuries caused were grievous but not dangerous to life. The firearm used was recovered, and there was no apprehension of tampering with evidence. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Judicial Custody - The petitioner has been in judicial custody, and the trial may take a considerable time; thus, bail was granted. (Paras 5, 7)

(C) Conditions for Bail - The accused-petitioner is to furnish a personal bond and sureties for his appearance in court. (Para 8)

(D) Observations - The findings are limited to the bail application and do not prejudice the trial court. (Para 9)

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

1. This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C . (483 BNS S) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.413/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagaur, District Nagaur, for offences under Sections 329(3) , 109(1) and 118(2) of BNS ; and Sections 3/25 and 7/27 of Arms Act .

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at Bar. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, who is an Ex-Army Personal, has been falsely implicated in the present case owing to previous animosity with the complainant party. Learned counsel submitted that various civil/revenue disputes are going on between the present petitioner and the complainant party.

4. Drawing attention of the Court towards the challan papers and the injury report of the injured persons attached with the challan papers, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the alleged incident which occurred on 06.09.2024, the gun shot injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioner upon the injured persons namely Gomti Devi, Omprakash and Mamata are though grievous in nature but are not dangerous to life.

5. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; the fire arm allegedly used by the petitioner in commission of the alleged crime has already been recovered by the Investigating Agency; the challan against him has already been filed before the competent criminal Court; and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

6. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that in the alleged incident which occurred on 06.09.2024, the gun shot/fire arm injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioner upon the injured persons namely Gomti Devi, Omprakash and Mamata are though grievous in nature but are not dangerous to life. He was also not in a position to refute the fact there is no apprehension of the petitioner influencing the material prosecution witnesses of the case or tampering with the evidence or fleeing away from justice, in case, he is enlarged on bail.

7. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

8. Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C . (483 BNSS) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Bhanwar Singh S/o Deeparam, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.413/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagaur, District Nagaur, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, for his appearance before that Court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

9. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top