SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 33

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
RAVI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Deepak Menaria, Mr. Sharwan Singh Rathore, PP, Mr. Pradyum Patel, Mr. Rajendra Singh

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1. This second application for bail under 483 BNSS  has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.250/2024 registered at Police Station Industrial Area, District Pali, for offences under Sections 189(4), 329(3), 115(2), 191(3), 111(2)(b) , 49 and 109(1)/190 of BNS .

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR, challan papers and statements of the injured persons namely Rakesh and Omdutt Dave recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not been named as an accused in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in the present case solely on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused persons so also no weapon allegedly used in the commission of the alleged crime has been recovered at the instance of the present petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the statements of the injured persons namely Rakesh and Ombutt Dave clearly indicate that specific allegation of infli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top