SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 869

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL, J
KOMAL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent
CW / 13208 / 2017



Advocates:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya with Ms. Vinita Saini, Mr. Vinod Gupta, Mr. Manish Gupta with Ms. Shweta Soni, Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta

Eligibility for the INSPIRE scholarship is contingent upon timely application and compliance with administrative guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Scholarship Scheme - INSPIRE Scholarship for Higher Education (SHE) - Eligibility criteria require candidates to be top 1% in 12th class and to apply within specified time - Petitioner failed to apply within the time limit and did not ensure college name was on the online portal. (Paras 2, 4, 6)

(B) Administrative Guidelines - Revised guidelines mandate that students must ensure their college is listed on the online portal before application submission - Failure to comply renders the application ineligible. (Paras 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for the INSPIRE scholarship but was denied due to late submission and her college not being listed on the online portal.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner did not meet the eligibility requirements as per the scholarship guidelines.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner should be allowed the scholarship despite the college's omission and the timing of her application.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that adherence to the scholarship scheme's guidelines is mandatory for eligibility, and the petitioner failed to comply with the necessary conditions.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Judgment :

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner for grant of “INSPIRE” scholarship for higher education “SHE” under Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspire Research.

2. The relevant facts in brief are that the respondent no.1- the Government of India through the Ministry of Science and Technology, invited applications for grant of scholarship for higher education “SHE” from the eligible candidates. The eligibility criteria is that the candidate must be amongst 1% topper in 12th class from any recognized State or Central Board in India and who is pursuing three years B.Sc., B.Sc. (honors), four years B.S. and other courses. Since, the petitioner fulfilled the eligibility criteria, she applied for grant of scholarship. However, her candidature did not find favour with the respondents on the premise that she failed to apply within the permissible time limit, i.e., 15.11.2016 to 15.01.2017 (three months).

3. Inviting attention of this Court towards the application form submitted by her on 10.01.2017, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although, she had applied in time, but, it was not forwarded by the concerned college, where she was pursuing her graduation course, to the concerned authorities. He submits that in view thereof, she should not suffer on account of fault of the college. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition be allowed and the respondents be directed to extend her benefit of “SHE”.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents no.1 and 2, inviting attention of this Court towards the revised guidelines dated 01.11.2016 issued by them for adding college/university name, would submit that if name of any college or university is not reflected on the online inspire web portal, the concerned college/university or the student is required to contact Inspire Programme Division at the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi either in person or by post well in advance at least fifteen days before submission of the application form to the portal with valid documents and since, name of the respondent no.4- college was unavailable on the portal and the petitioner failed to add its name on the concerned web portal, her application could not be entertained. He, therefore, prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

5. Heard. Considered.

6. Indisputably, name of the respondent no.4-college, where the petitioner was pursuing her graduation course, was not available on the online inspire web portal, a condition precedent for entertaining the application for grant of “SHE” and it is also an admitted position that the petitioner failed to add her college at the online inspire web portal as directed by the respondents vide revised guidelines for adding college/university name vide direction dated 01.11.2016. Since, the petitioner failed to apply for grant of “SHE” in accordance with the scholarship scheme and the revised guidelines issued by the respondents, this Court does not find her eligible and entitled for its grant.

7. Resultantly, this writ petition is dismissed being devoid of merit.

8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top