SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 887

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI, J
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ratana Ram, Mr. N.S. Chandawat, Mr. Dinesh

Order :

1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.PC/528 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.9/2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Additional Commissioner (Crime), Commissionerate, Jodhpur for the offence under Sections 420 and 120 of the IPC and Section 66-C of the IT Act, on the ground of compromise.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute in this matter is inter se between the parties which does not affect the societal interest or anyway disturb the tranquility or public peace. It is further submitted that dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an amicable settlement, for which a compromise-deed has been executed and submitted before this Court, and now, there remains no controversy in between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal proceedings further.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for complainant-respondent No.2 admits the fact of compromise and submits that complainant-respondent No.2 is willing if the FIR and the proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise entered in between the parties.

4. Learned Deputy Gover

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top