SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 899

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J
MANJU DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. J.S. Saluja for Mr. David Mehla, Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi

Order :

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 24.11.2020 (Annex.12), whereby the appellate authority dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the order dated 21.01.2020 before the respondent No.2-Appellate Authority. He further submits that the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground of delay despite there being a clear direction from Hon’ble the Supreme Court to condone delay of the period which the country was facing pandemic of Covid-19. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition may be allowed and the order dated 24.11.2020 passed by the Appellate Authority may be quashed and set aside.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the State submits that the Appellate Authority has rejected the appeal of the petitioner being time barred and, therefore, no interference in warranted.

4. I have considered the submissions made before this Court and have gone through the relevant record of the case.

5. The appeal preferred against the order dated 21.01.2020 has been dismissed by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top