SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Manipur) 25

M. V. MURALIDARAN
Kumari Amom Mema Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kumari Thokchom Manglembi Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. K. Modhusudon, Advocate, for the Applicant.

JUDGMENT

MV Muralidaran, J. - This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT to condone the delay of 415 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21.12.2019 passed in O.S.No.105 of 2017 on the file of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Imphal West.

2. O.S.No.105 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioner against the respondents for recovery of a sum of Rs.25,07,500/-together with interest and costs. By the judgment and decree, the said suit was dismissed on 21.12.2019. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed the appeal along with petition for condonation of the delay of 415 days.

3. Mr. K. Modhusudon, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the judgment and decree of the suit was not declared on 21.12.2019, however, the e-court status, it was shown that the said case was disposed of on 21.12.2019 as uncontested. The learned counsel would submit that the suit was last listed on 15.5.2019 and fixed on 6.6.2019 for orders. However, the order was not declared on 6.6.2019 and subsequently fixed the dates on 10.7.2019, 14.8.2019,10.9.2019, 19.10.2019, 8.11.2019, 17.12.2019 and 21.12.2019. Thereafter, the lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top