SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 940

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J
Chief Manager – Appellant
Versus
Manju Devi Porwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Pradeep Singh Khichi

ORDER :

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J.)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

“1. That, the impugned order dated 18.05.2023 (Annexure-5) passed by the Ld. Senior Civil Judge, Kapasan, Chittorgarh, in Civil Misc. Application No.08/2022, titled as Smt. Manju Devi Vs. Smt. Radha Bai and Ors. may kindly be quashed and set aside; or

2. That, the proceedings in Civil Suit No.12/2022, titled as Smt. Manju Devi Vs. Smt. Radha Bai and Ors. pending before the Ld. Senior Civil Judge, Kapasan, Chittorgarh, may kindly be quashed and set aside.

3. That, alternatively, the proceedings in Civil Suit No.12/2022 and Civil Misc. Application No.08/2022, titled as Smt. Manju Devi Vs. Smt. Radha Bai and Ors. pending before the Ld. Senior Civil Judge, Kapasan, Chittorgarh, may kindly be directed to be decided as expeditiously as possible within a fixed time frame.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is Bank from whom the respondents have taken loan and because of partition suit, the interim order has been passed in the matter, wherein the petitioner is also party-responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top