Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI, JJ
KAMLESH MEENA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order :
1. The prayer made in the special appeal writs is as follows :-
“It is therefore, humbly and most respectfully prayed that this Special Appeal may kindly be allowed and:
a). The impugned order/judgment dated 27.01.2027 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1842/2025 (Kamlesh Meena Vs. State & Ors.), may kindly be quashed and set aside and the writ petition filed by the appellant-petitioner may kindly be allowed and the transfer order dated 15.01.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside.
b). Any other appropriate order, direction which this Hon’ble court deems fit in the interest of justice and the appellants- petitioner may kindly be passed.”
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this Court to Section 3 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 , which reads as follows :-
3. Interpretation – In this Act, unless the subject or context otherwise requires -
(i) “Land Records Officer” shall mean the collector and shall include Additional or Assistant Land Records Officer;
3[(ia) “Municipality” shall have the meaning assigned to it by the Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951 (Rajasthan Act 23 of 1951) or any other municipal law for the
The authority issuing the order was competent despite a misapplication of the seal, which did not affect the validity of the order.
The Board of Revenue exceeded its jurisdiction by entertaining a revision against a non-meritorious permit to withdraw, as the underlying assistant collector's order remained unchallenged.
Implementation and execution of impugned order - It is a settled position of law that whenever there is a statutory remedy created by Statute, that has to be respected and High Court cannot usurp jur....
State's delayed challenge to the land grant lacks merit as no substantiating evidence was presented, affirming the integrity of rights established over decades.
Supervisory jurisdiction is limited to ensuring tribunals act within their authority and does not permit re-assessing evidence. Once land is legally acquired and possession taken by the state, subseq....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appeal under Section 20 of the Act of 1975 was not maintainable as the order was passed under Section 9-A, which was non-appealable. The j....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
