SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 982

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
MANOJ S/O SHRI DHUARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. R.R. Balsa, Adv., Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP, Mr. Dushyant Jain, Adv.

Order :

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.663/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur, for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 109(1) of B.N.S.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 109(1) of B.N.S. read with Section 3/25-A of the Arms Act. It is argued that the allegations against the accused-petitioners are omnibus in nature and not specific. The accused-petitioner-party also lodged a cross FIR against the complainant-party and the persons of accused- petitioner-party also sustained injures. The allegation of using firearm is against the other co-accused Manvendra and not against the present accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 19.12.2024, investigation/trial of the case may take considerable time. None of the injured sustained any injury which was found to be dangerous to life, the injuries were found to be simple blunt in nature, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top