SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1021

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
DHARMVEER SANSI @ DHARMA SANSI S/O PRASADILAL SANSI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Umesh Dixit, Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP

Order :

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 179/2024 registered at Police Station Bhankrota, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 8/20, 8/28 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that petitioner was already arrested in the case registered under Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act bearing FIR No. 1149/2023 and in that case the information was rendered by the petitioner. The police in that case did not file the charge-sheet under section 8/20 read with Section 8/29 of NDPS Act rather arrested the petitioner by lodging a separate FIR under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act, though the procedure adopted by the police is not correct. It is alleged against the petitioner that at his instance 19.800kg of Ganja was recovered. The accused petitioner is in custody since 25.05.2024 and charge-sheet has already been produced. Provisions of Section 37 NDPS Act is not attracted as recovered quantity of alleged contraband article is below commercial quantity. Therefo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top