SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1065

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA, J
Radheshyam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Pankaj Gupta, for Mr. Dinesh Yadav; Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

Order :

1. The present criminal revision petition has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 397 read with Section 401 of CrPC assailing the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.08.2004 passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Alwar (for short ‘the trial Court’) in Criminal Case No.401/1997, whereby the trial Court convicted the accused- petitioner for the offence punishable u/S 279, 337, 338 & 304-A IPC and sentenced him to undergo one years’ imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/-. The petitioner had further challenged the aforesaid order/judgment dated 21.08.2004 passed by the trial Court by filing a Criminal Appeal bearing No.56/2005 before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track No. 2, Alwar, whereby the learned Court vide order dated 05.08.2005 had dismissed the appeal filed by the accused petitioner and affirmed the order passed by the trial Court.

2. Learned counsel for the revisionist- petitioner submits that the sentence, so awarded to the revisionist-petitioner, was suspended by the Court vide its order dated 23.09.2005. Counsel further submits that the present matter pertains to an incident which occurred in year 1997 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top