SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1100

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J
K K BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE P H E D ORS – Respondent
CW / 14141 / 2011



Advocates:
Mr. Ashish Gausingha Ms. Yuvika Pilania-Asstt.G.C. for Ms. Minakshi Jain-G.C.

Retiral dues must be released promptly after disciplinary proceedings; unjustified delays warrant interest on delayed payments.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16 - Rajasthan Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1996 - Rule 89 - Writ petition for release of gratuity and commutation amount - Petitioner retired on 31.07.2008 but dues were withheld due to pending departmental enquiry - Enquiry concluded on 26.07.2010, and penalty imposed was stoppage of 10% of pension for one year - Court found no justified reason for withholding retiral dues and directed payment of interest at 9% per annum for delayed payment. (Paras 2, 4, 5)

(B) Delay in Payment - Court emphasized that retiral dues should be released immediately after the conclusion of the enquiry and unnecessary delays are not justified. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner retired after reaching superannuation, but his gratuity and commutation were withheld due to a pending departmental enquiry. The enquiry concluded with a penalty imposed on the petitioner.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the petitioner is entitled to interest at 9% for the delayed payment of retiral dues from the date of the punishment order.

Issues: The main issue was whether the withholding of retiral dues was justified given the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once the enquiry concluded, the retiral dues should have been released without unnecessary delay, and the petitioner is entitled to interest as per the relevant rules.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for payment.

Order :

1. By way of filing of this writ petition, a prayer has been made for releasing the gratuity and commutation amount to the petitioner with interest @ 12% per annum.

2. Contents of the writ petition indicate that the petitioner stood retired on 31.07.2008 after attaining the age of superannuation but his retiral dues including gratuity and commutation amount were withheld by the respondents, hence he approached this Court by way of filing of this writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that at the time of retirement of the petitioner, the departmental enquiry under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short, ‘the Rules of 1958’) was pending against him and thereafter, he was punished with penalty of stoppage of 10% part of pension for one year. Counsel submits that immediately thereafter, the petitioner was asked upon to submit the requisite form but the petitioner refused to submit the same, hence slight delay has occurred in releasing the gratuity and commutation amount to the petitioner, hence under these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief including the interest on the delayed payment of retiral dues.

4. Considering the arguments raised by counsel for the respondents and looking to the fact that disciplinary enquiry came to an end on 26.07.2010, where the penalty of stoppage of 10% part of pension of the petitioner for a period of one year was passed, this Court finds no justified reasons to withhold the retrial dues of the petitioner for a considerable time. The respondents were supposed to release the retiral dues to the petitioner immediately after conclusion of the domestic enquiry. Unnecessary delay has occurred for which the petitioner is entitled to get interest at @ 9% in terms of the Rules 89 of the Rajasthan Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1996 (for short, ‘the Rules of 1996’).

5. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of by issuing a direction to the respondents to pay interest @ 9% per annum to the petitioner for the delayed payment of retiral dues and other service benefits to the petitioner w.e.f. the date when the punishment order was passed in terms of the Rule 89 of the Rules of 1996.

6. Needless to observe that the respondents would comply with the order passed by this Court within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

7. Since the petitioner has remained unrepresented before this Court and he is not aware about passing of this order, let a copy of this order be sent to the residential address of the petitioner mentioned in the memo of cause title, for his intimation and information.

8. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top