SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1100

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J
K K BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE P H E D ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Ashish Gausingha Ms. Yuvika Pilania-Asstt.G.C. for Ms. Minakshi Jain-G.C.

Order :

1. By way of filing of this writ petition, a prayer has been made for releasing the gratuity and commutation amount to the petitioner with interest @ 12% per annum.

2. Contents of the writ petition indicate that the petitioner stood retired on 31.07.2008 after attaining the age of superannuation but his retiral dues including gratuity and commutation amount were withheld by the respondents, hence he approached this Court by way of filing of this writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that at the time of retirement of the petitioner, the departmental enquiry under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short, ‘the Rules of 1958’) was pending against him and thereafter, he was punished with penalty of stoppage of 10% part of pension for one year. Counsel submits that immediately thereafter, the petitioner was asked upon to submit the requisite form but the petitioner refused to submit the same, hence slight delay has occurred in releasing the gratuity and commutation amount to the petitioner, hence under these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief including the interest on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top