Madan Son Of Ramnarain Meena vs State Of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1189

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J
Madan Son Of Ramnarain Meena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rinesh Gupta with Mr. Sarwat Alam
For the Respondent: Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP

Table of Content
1. conviction for rape (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. defense arguments on identification (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. credibility of prosecutrix (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. prosecution's burden of proof (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
5. judgment quashed (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)

Judgment :

2. By passing the impugned judgment, the appellants have been convicted for the offence under Section 376 IPC and they have been sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment (for short 'RI') with fine of Rs.500/- each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo one month's additional RI. They have also been convicted for the offence under 447 IPC and sentenced to undergo three months RI.Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

4. Upon this report, Crime No.142/1989 was registered with the Police Station Chaksu for the offences under Section 376(2), 379 and 34 IPC. After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was submitted against the appellants for the offence under Section 376 IPC. Thereafter, charges were framed against the accused-appellants for the above offences. The accuse