SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1512

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
REKHA BORANA
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Bhanwar Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.L. Jain

ORDER :

1. Despite service, none appears for the respondents.

2. The present two writ petitions arise out of the same suit proceedings and hence, are being heard together and decided by this common order.

3. The facts as averred in the plaint by the plaintiff-petitioner are that two residential plots were purchased by the parents of the plaintiff and defendants No.8 to 10 vide agreements to sell dated 22.07.1980. However, the possession of the said plots was forcibly taken by defendants No.1 to 5. Hence, the present suit for declaration, possession and mandatory injunction was filed.

4. On 03.12.2012, an application under Order VII Rule 14(3), CPC was filed by the plaintiff petitioner with a prayer to take the original agreements to sell dated 22.07.1980 on record. It was submitted in the application that although the photocopies of the said agreements were annexed along with the plaint but as the original documents had been furnished for blueprints qua patta inquiry, they could not be placed on record along with the plaint. The said agreements being the whole basis of the suit, were prayed to be taken on record.

5. Vide order dated 01.03.2014, the learned Additional District Judge, Suj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top