Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Mansingh S/o Shri Mangoliram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Nagar Palikas, Hindaun City – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner-workman (hereinafter referred to as ‘the workman’) challenging the award dated 16.05.2018 passed by the Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Bharatpur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Labour Court’) in Case No. LCR 2738/2015 whereby the termination of services of the workman has been held to be invalid and the respondents-employer (hereinafter referred to as ‘employer’) has been directed to pay compensation of Rs.25,000/- to the workman in lieu of reinstatement.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the workman in his claim petition filed before the Labour Court averred that he was engaged as daily wager – Safai Jamadar w.e.f. 19.09.1991 till 30.09.1992 but without serving any notice, his services were terminated and he was not paid any amount of compensation. It was pleaded in the petition that services of the workman were terminated in violation of the provisions of Sections 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Act of 1947 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act of 1947’). In the claim petition, the workman prayed for declaring his termination as null and void in view of violation of the provisions of
Reinstatement is not automatic for daily wage workers upon illegal termination; compensation can be awarded instead, reflecting the length of service.
Compensation in lieu of reinstatement is warranted where termination violates Section 25F, reflecting a judicial trend favoring monetary relief over automatic reinstatement, particularly for daily wa....
Reinstatement of daily wage workers is not automatic upon illegal termination; monetary compensation may be awarded instead, particularly when procedural violations occur.
Reinstatement is not automatic in cases of delayed disputes; monetary compensation may be awarded instead, especially for procedural violations under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Reinstatement of a daily wage worker is not automatic upon illegal termination; monetary compensation may be awarded instead, particularly considering the worker's age and service duration.
Monetary compensation can be awarded instead of reinstatement for daily wage workers whose termination is found illegal due to procedural defects, as reinstatement is not automatic.
Monetary compensation is preferred over reinstatement for daily wage workers whose termination is found illegal, especially after significant delays.
The court established that compensation for wrongful termination must reflect the workman's service duration and adhere to the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Reinstatement of workmen is not automatic; courts can award monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement based on service length and circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
