Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Chhote Lal S/o Shri Kalyan – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Karauli – Respondent
Order :
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J.
1. By way of filing of this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned award dated 08.11.2011 passed by the Labour Court, Bharatpur in LCR Case No.212/1991 by which the statement of claim submitted by the petitioner-workman has been partly allowed while setting aside his termination order dated 01.11.1988 and a direction has been issued to the respondents to pay lump-sum amount of compensation of Rs.40,000/- in lieu of his reinstatement.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was engaged as Beldar in the month of June, 1987 by the respondents and his services were taken till October, 1988 and all of sudden, his services were terminated on 01.11.1988 without issuing any notice and without making any payment of compensation, which has resulted in violation of mandatory provisions contained under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1947’). Learned counsel submits that the petitioner raised an industrial dispute before the Labour Court by way of filing statement of claim and the petitioner has established this fact on the record that he has worked with the respondents
Monetary compensation can be awarded instead of reinstatement for daily wage workers whose termination is found illegal due to procedural defects, as reinstatement is not automatic.
Monetary compensation is preferred over reinstatement for daily wage workers whose termination is found illegal, especially after significant delays.
Compensation in lieu of reinstatement is warranted where termination violates Section 25F, reflecting a judicial trend favoring monetary relief over automatic reinstatement, particularly for daily wa....
Reinstatement is not automatic in cases of delayed disputes; monetary compensation may be awarded instead, especially for procedural violations under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Reinstatement of daily wage workers is not automatic upon illegal termination; monetary compensation may be awarded instead, particularly when procedural violations occur.
Reinstatement is not automatic for daily wage workers upon illegal termination; compensation can be awarded instead, reflecting the length of service.
Compensation, rather than reinstatement, is appropriate for daily wage workers whose termination is found illegal due to procedural defects, especially when no mala fide intent is established.
Reinstatement of a daily wage worker is not automatic upon illegal termination; monetary compensation may be awarded instead, particularly considering the worker's age and service duration.
Reinstatement of workmen is not automatic; courts can award monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement based on service length and circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
