SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1535

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SAMEER JAIN
Mohit Soni S/o. Shri Giriraj Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Represented through Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government Secretariat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.N. Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Utkarsh Dubey, Mr. Abhay Singh, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Mr. Ajatshatru Mina with Mr. Movil Jeenwal, Mr. Himanshu Kala, Mr. Nripraj Bhati, Mr. Anand Sharma for Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. Anoop Pareek with Mr. Parnav Pareek, Mr. Tarun Verma for Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank, Mr. Aamir Khan for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Mr. Sudhir Yadav for Mr. Brajesh Kumar Jatti, Mr. Nikhil Kumawat, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Mr. Mohammad Wasim Khan, Mr. Vikash Ghosalya.
For the Respondent: Mr. Kartikaya Sharma with Mr. Aditya Sharma for Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG, Ms. Manju Joshi, AGC with Ms. Deepa Singh, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Maheshwari with Ms. Bhavana Ladha, Dr. Abhinav Sharma, Mr. Shobit Tiwari with Mr. Pushpendra Singh Tanwar, Mr. Rohit Tiwari.

JUDGMENT :

1. In the present batch of writ petitions, the core controversy requiring adjudication predominantly pertains to the legality and validity of the impugned result dated 17.12.2024 declared by the respondents in pursuance to the examination conducted in furtherance to the advertisement dated 20.06.2023 whereby the respondent-Board had invited applications for the post of Junior Accountant and Tehsil Revenue Accountant. Although ancillary issues are also raised, the principal question of law revolves around the legality and validity of the impugned result whereby the respondents have included the candidates of Ministerial Employees (hereinafter referred to as ‘ME category’) by treating their candidature in the SC, ST or General category. Having regard to the commonality of issues both in law and in fact, and upon consent being recorded from the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, this Court deems it appropriate to treat SBCWP NO. 278/2025 titled as Mohit Soni and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. as the lead petition for the purposes of this adjudication.

2. It is, however, considered apposite to clarify at the outset that while there may exist factual va

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top