Rajasthan High Court vs Rajat Yadav - 2025 Supreme(SC) 2119

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 2119

DIPANKAR DATTA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Rajasthan High Court – Appellant
Versus
Rajat Yadav – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Kartik Seth, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Saini, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shubhankar Singh, Adv. Mr. Lakshmi Kant Srivastava, Adv. Mr. K. M. Abish, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Adv. Mr. Minesh Joshi, Adv. M/s Chambers Of Kartik Seth, AOR Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Avinash Sharma, AOR Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Sr. Adv. Mr. P.S. Teji, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, AOR Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv. Mr. R.S.M. Kalky, Adv. Dr. R.K. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. S.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ravi Shankar Singh, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Aditi Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Nav Parkash Singh Teji, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Jain, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Malik, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bhim Kishore, Adv. Ms. Prabjeet Sandhu, Adv. Mr. Satpal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Raj Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Amit, AOR

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

THE APPEALS

1. A Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, allowed D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7564 of 2023 and connected matters vide judgment and order dated 18th September, 2023¹[impugned order]. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the administration of the High Court and its Registrar²[appellants] have preferred these civil appeals by special leave.

BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS

2. The basic facts triggering the appellate proceedings before us are undisputed.

3. The Rajasthan District Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986 were framed to regulate appointments and conditions of service in the ministerial es

Click Here to Read the rest of this document