SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 2119

DIPANKAR DATTA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Rajasthan High Court – Appellant
Versus
Rajat Yadav – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Kartik Seth, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Saini, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shubhankar Singh, Adv. Mr. Lakshmi Kant Srivastava, Adv. Mr. K. M. Abish, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Adv. Mr. Minesh Joshi, Adv. M/s Chambers Of Kartik Seth, AOR Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Avinash Sharma, AOR Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Sr. Adv. Mr. P.S. Teji, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, AOR Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv. Mr. R.S.M. Kalky, Adv. Dr. R.K. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. S.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ravi Shankar Singh, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Aditi Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Nav Parkash Singh Teji, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Jain, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Malik, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bhim Kishore, Adv. Ms. Prabjeet Sandhu, Adv. Mr. Satpal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Raj Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Amit, AOR

Table of Content
1. undisputed facts regarding recruitment process (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. contentions regarding recruitment rules (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
3. analysis of reservation principles and merit (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
4. arguments against category-wise shortlisting (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
5. petitioners' claims on merit based inclusion (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. final verdict and directive for compliance (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79)

JUDGMENT :

DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

THE APPEALS

1. A Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, allowed D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7564 of 2023 and connected matters vide judgment and order dated 18th September, 20231[impugned order]. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the administration of the High Court and its Registrar2[appellants] have preferred these civil appeals by special leave.

BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS

2. The basic facts triggering the appellate proceedings before us are undisputed.

3. The Rajasthan District Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986 were framed to regulate appointments and conditions of service in the ministerial establishments of the District Courts. Therea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top