Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
ASHA RAWAT D/O SHRI CHANDRA SINGH RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order :
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J.)
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
“1. By an appropriate direction the respondent be directed to release all service benefits including seniority, selection scale and all other benefits as has been granted to her juniors.
2. By an appropriate directions, order respondent be directed in taking into consideration the first date of appointment as 13-1-1996 and the release of payment and arrears to the petitioner. The order dated 5-7-2011 and 17-11-2016 may kindly be quashed and set-aside.
3. By an appropriate direction the recovery made by the Respondent by amending the date of initial appointment arbitrarily may be directed to refund make to the petitioner that 24 percent interest.
4. By an appropriate writ petition order the seniority given to the petitioner as has been given during the date of initial appointment for her juniors named in above para.
5. Any other appropriate relief which is Hon’ble Court deemed for a period may be given in grant in favour of the petition.”
2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents to treat her date of appointment as 13.01.1996 inst
Amendments to rules typically have prospective effect unless explicitly stated otherwise, impacting service benefits and seniority.
Individuals reporting for duty, but not assigned tasks, cannot be denied salary, affirming that appointment dates should effectively relate to the dates juniors were appointed.
Delays in appointment due to prioritizing junior candidates necessitate recognizing the original joining date for benefits, including salary and pension.
The court reaffirmed that seniority cannot be granted retrospectively from an earlier appointment date when it adversely affects validly appointed recruits.
A belated claim for service-related benefits is generally barred by delay and laches unless it arises from a continuing wrong, which was not established in this case.
Employee entitled to notional increments from appointment date despite qualification requirements, with actual benefits post-qualification.
Seniority in recruitment must align with merit rankings, ensuring fair treatment of candidates based on their performance in a common selection process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
