HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
ARUN MONGA, J.
Anil Paliwal, S/o Shri Chiranji Lal Paliwal – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Of Rajasthan and Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17086 Of 2022 Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13163 of 2022, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14767 Of 2023
Decided On : 01-04-2025
Order :
(ARUN MONGA, J.)
1. Since above titled petitions involve common inter connected issues and facts, they are being decided through this common order.
2. The petitioner is before this Court having preferred three writ petitions viz. :-
2.1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14767/2023 inter-alia seeking quashing of an order dated 07.09.2023 (Annexure-23) whereby, petitioner was pronounced as "deemed to have resigned from service" w.e.f. 05.05.2022.
2.2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17086/2022 challenging an order dated 22.04.2022 whereby, petitioner was directed to report for joining for "work arrangement" and assigned duties other than teaching job, which he declined.
2.3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13163/2022, inter alia, for a direction to the respondents to release the salary of the petitioner from the month of May, 2022.
3. The factual narrative is taken from S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14767/2023, wherein challenge is to the order dated 07.09.2023 (Annexure-23) passed under Rule 86(4)(a) of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 (for short, 'the RSR Rules') vide which, the petitioner's absence was treated as deemed resignation.
3.1. The petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in Government aided Teachers' Training College and thereafter, he was absorbed in Government service.
3.2. The respondents issued order dated 22.04.2022 to the Principals of the five Government Colleges to relieve the B.Ed. faculty members for reporting at the office of Commissioner, College Education. The petitioner was relieved along with other teachers on 22.04.2022 itself. He reported for duty on 04.05.2022 after availing of the joining period (Yogkaal). However, the same day itself, he applied for Headquarter Leave due to personal exigency, while submitting that he will apply for the appropriate Leave admissible to him.
3.3. Thereafter, vide communication dated 05.05.2022, the petitioner requested for granting him summer vacation when he was at the Office of the Assistant Director, Regional Office, Udaipur. The petitioner was served with a show cause notice on 05.05.2022 asking him to explain as to why he reported late for duty. The petitioner gave his detailed explanation on 07.05.2022.
3.4. The petitioner received another show cause notice dated 17.05.2022 from the Additional Commissioner to explain as to why proceedings be not initiated against him for insubordination. The petitioner gave his explanation vide communication dated 18.05.2022 and also on 19.05.2022.
3.5. Since the grievance of the petitioner regarding grant of joining period and TA/DA as well as for grant of summer vacations remained unaddressed, he preferred a writ petition bearing No. 8290/2022, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 03.06.2022 while directing the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner on 26.05.2022.
3.6. Besides the grievance of the petitioner as stated above, the salary of the petitioner since month of May, 2022 was stopped by the Respondents. Being aggrieved, the petitioner thus preferred writ petition no.13163/2022. The petitioner also filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17086/2022 inter-alia challenging the order dated 22.04.2022 whereby, he was directed to give joining for "work arrangement" and assigned duties other than teaching job, which he refused. On 22.11.2022, this Court issued notices and the matter is pending further adjudication.
3.7. A show cause notice dated 12.12.2022 was issued to the petitioner, alleging absence from duty since 05.05.2022, under Rule 17 of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958. The petitioner submitted a detailed reply on 18.12.2022 narrat
3.8. A communication dated 29.05.2023 was again issued to the petitioner granting last opportunity to him join within seven days, failing which proceedings under Rule 86 of the Rules of 1951 would be initiated. The petitioner responded to the same vide communication dated 30.05.2023.
3.9. The respondents eventually passed an order dated 07
AI
Conditions for deemed resignation under Rule 86 of the Rajasthan Service Rules were not met as the petitioner abandoned duty without applying for leave.
Termination of service without due process is illegal; absence should be treated as resignation, not termination.
A resignation is invalid if not given with the stipulated notice under applicable rules, especially when submitted under acute mental distress.
The court held that resignations cannot be accepted while disciplinary proceedings are pending, affirming the principle that withdrawal of resignation restores continuity of service.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.