ORDER :

Heard Sri D.Linga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.Bhupal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner filed this writ petition to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner by holding that the petitioner is deemed to have resigned from the service without conducting regular enquiry vide orders issued by the 2nd respondent in impugned Rc.No.4684/A2.1/2011-12, dated 09.08.2012 and Rc.No.4684/A2.1/2011-13, dated 14.06.2013 respectively as being erroneous, arbitrary, illegal contrary to Rules, opposed to principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently to hold that the petitioner is entitled to be reinstated into service with all consequential benefits and further direct the respondents to treat the period from 14.07.2011 to 08.08.2012 as compulsory wait for all purposes.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:

a