SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1587

2025 RJ-JD 21584-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, REKHA BORANA, JJ.
Rameshwar, S/o. Shri Hema Ram Ji & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3707 of 2023
Decided On : 06-05-2025
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Satya Prakash Sharma.
For the Respondents : Mr. Ayush Gehlot for Mr. Rajesh Panwar, AAG, Mr. Vineet R. Dave for Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sunil Joshi, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Rathore.

A Public Interest Litigation cannot be entertained when similar issues are pending in a civil suit, as it involves disputed questions of fact.

Headnote:(A) Public Interest Litigation - The petitioners sought to protect public land from encroachment by a private trust, claiming illegal construction and obstruction of access to Kuchaman Hill. The court found that similar issues were pending in a civil suit, thus rendering the PIL misconceived. (Paras 1-3, 10-16)

(B) Civil Procedure - The court emphasized that when a civil suit is pending regarding the same issues, a PIL cannot be entertained as it involves disputed questions of fact. (Paras 14-15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners claimed that the Trust illegally constructed a boundary wall and water dam, obstructing public access to Kuchaman Hill. They sought various reliefs, including the removal of constructions and restoration of public access.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the issues raised in the PIL were already being addressed in a civil suit, thus the PIL was dismissed.

Issues: The main issues included whether the PIL could be entertained given the pending civil suit and the nature of the reliefs sought.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the existence of a pending civil suit on the same issues precluded the entertainment of the PIL, emphasizing the need to resolve disputes through appropriate legal channels.

Result: The PIL petition was dismissed.

ORDER :

1. The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition has been filed by Rameshwar, Sanwar Mal, Vijendra Lakhan and Prem Chand claiming that they are espousing the public cause, that is, to protect the lives and properties of the inhabitants and residents of civil area situated at downfall in foothills (rygVh) of Kuchaman Hill, which is a mountain of Kuchaman City of District Nagaur, on which the old fort named as ‘Kuchaman Fort’ is situated.

2. The petitioners have stated in the PIL petition that respondent No.8 - Shri Maa Anandmayi Kuchaman Kila Trust (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trust’) obtained a permission from the respondent – Municipal Council, Kuchaman City to erect fencing with pillars around the bottom of the hill. But in garb of the said permission, respondent No.8 started raising boundary wall around the hill with a view to lock the entire Kuchaman Hill and has, even undertaken the process for construction of a water dam/embankment on one side of the hill. It is further pleaded that the said illegal construction of boundary wall and the water dam has resulted into encroachment over the public land and as a result thereof, there is complete restraint of passage of the local residents to Kuchaman Hill. Moreover, the construction of water dam would be a danger to lives and properties of the local residents.

3. With the above pleadings, the following reliefs have been prayed for :

“(A) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent Municipal Authorities, Kuchaman City (Nagaur) or other public authorities of the State, may kindly be directed (i) to protect the kuchaman hill, from being grabbed by respondent private trust “Shri Maa Anandmayi Kuchaman Trust, Kuchaman Killa” or any successors of former king of Kuchaman, (ii) to restrain respondent trust, from encroaching the public land of hills, for raising any kind of construction, (iii) to restrain respondent trust, from locking the entire hills by raising any kind of construction of boundary wall, around hills, (iv) not to disturb passage of public to kuchaman hills.

(B) By any appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondent Municipal Authorities of Kuchaman City, may kindly be directed to take suitable action in the matter and not to permit anyone to raise any kind of construction or to raise any boundary wall, at the bottom on the downfall (talhati) of kuchaman hill and any construction raised by respondent trust, may kindly be ordered to be removed on the cost and expenditure of respondent trust, to restore original look of kuchaman hill.

(C) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the residents of Mirdha Nagar Colony and other adjacent residential areas of kuchaman hill, may kindly be allowed to use public way, situated at bottom talhati of Kuchaman Hill, to reach their destinations and not to restrict anyone to visit top area of kuchaman hill.

(D) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, the respondents state public authorities, responsible for construction of public way, may kindly be directed; to construct pukka road (public way) on existing public way, for public at talhati of kuchaman hill and public rainy nala, blocked by respondent Trust, so as to serve public cause for public interest.

(E) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may kindly be directed; to restore heritage look of kuchaman fort and to preserve it, for public view, and to remove the boundary wall raised by respondent trust and, to demolish water-dam constructed on hill, pillars and fencing, erected by respondent trust, which may kindly be ordered to be removed at the cost to be born by respondent trust.

(F) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the local residents, residing in talhati of kuchaman hill, who have suffered losses in flow of water supply, due to breakage of water pipelines, and who have suffered damages to their house, due to damage to boundary wall being erected

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top