IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI, JJ.
Rukma D/o Kaludas – Appellant
Versus
Sahdev S/o Prahalad Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI, J.
1. By way of both the instant civil misc. appeals filed under Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the appellant has raised her grievance against the judgment dated 24.05.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Merta (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Family Court’) in Civil Case Nos. 185/2021 and 189/2021, whereby the appellant’s application filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for divorce was rejected and the respondent’s application filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights was allowed.
1.1. The appellant has invoked magnanimity of this Court to set aside the judgment impugned dated 24.05.2023, allow her application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, dismiss the application of the respondent under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and pass a decree of divorce accordingly.
2. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the instant appeals are that the appellant solemnized marriage with the respondent on 25.05.2013 and their siblings also married each other as per ‘Aata Saata’ rituals. Subsequently, the respondent deserted the appellant shortly after the marriage, having tre
The court affirmed that without proven cruelty or desertion, a divorce application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act is likely to be rejected in favor of restitution of conjugal rights under....
Persistent insistence on separate residence without justifiable reason constitutes an act of cruelty, and filing of false complaints and prolonged deprivation of conjugal rights can lead to mental cr....
Divorce – Cruelty by husband – Compelling wife to discontinue her studies or creating such an atmosphere that she is put in a position not to continue her studies is equivalent to destroy her dreams ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the concept of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a weighty circumstance necessitating the severance of marital ties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific and substantiated instances of cruelty and desertion to support claims under Section 13(1)(ia) (ib) of the Hindu Marri....
Normal marital disagreements and the presence of in-laws do not constitute mental cruelty sufficient for divorce. The petitioner did not provide adequate evidence to support claims.
Mental cruelty can be established through conduct that forces a spouse to abandon their aspirations, justifying divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Cruelty is a sufficient ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, and a finding of cruelty necessitates the granting of a divorce, independent of other grounds such as desertion.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grounds of cruelty and desertion, as provided under Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, were proven by the responden....
The evidence must support the grounds for divorce, and the failure to seek restitution of conjugal rights despite the other party's willingness to reconcile may impact the validity of a divorce petit....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.