Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI
Mahendra @ Banti S/o Bhakraram Vishnoi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
ORDER :
Farjand Ali, J.
1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
“(A) The record of the police in relation to the petitioner may kindly be summoned.
(B) The letter dated 14.03.2014 issued by the Respondent No.1 should be quashed and set aside.
(C) The respondents may kindly be restrained from initiating history sheet proceeding against the petitioner and also restrained from adding the name of the petitioner in the Surveillance register.”
2. Brief facts of the case as placed before this Court by learned counsel for the petitioner are that on 23.01.2014, the SHO, Police Station Dangiyawas, District Jodhpur sent a letter to grant permission to open history-sheet of the petitioner pursuant to total 17 cases pending against him at that time. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, upon receipt of the aforesaid application, passed the impugned order dated 14.03.2014, whereby permission was granted to open history sheet against the petitioner.
3. The details of cases registered against the petitioner are as under:
| Sl. No. | Case Number/Date /Sections | Police Station | Result of Police | Decision/ Result |
| 1. | 419/27.12.200 6 Sections 41 and 23 of IP | |||
A history sheet can only be sustained if a person has three convictions or more than ten cases, with specific conditions regarding the age of cases.
A history sheet can only be maintained if a person has three consecutive convictions or more than ten cases, subject to judicial scrutiny.
A history-sheet can only be maintained if a person has three convictions or more than ten cases, irrespective of outcomes; the petitioner did not meet these criteria.
A history sheet can only be sustained if an individual has three consecutive convictions or more than ten cases, with specific conditions regarding the age of convictions.
The criteria for maintaining a history-sheet require either three convictions or more than ten cases against an individual, irrespective of outcomes.
A history sheet can only be sustained if a person has three convictions or more than ten cases, subject to specific time constraints on older cases.
The court established that a history-sheet can only be maintained if a person has three convictions or more than ten cases against them, subject to judicial scrutiny.
A history sheet can only be maintained if an individual has three convictions or more than ten cases, subject to specific conditions regarding the age of those cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
