SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1690

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR 
FARJAND ALI, J.
Rohit Sharma S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Ji Sharma - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp - Respondent 
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2477 Of 2018
Decided On : 17-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Komal R. Verma
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, Dy.G.A., Mr. Ravindra Singh, AGA

For extortion under IPC, there must be an intention to induce delivery of property due to fear; mere threats without delivery do not constitute the offence.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 383, 384, 385, and 506 - Quashing of FIR for extortion - Allegations of harassment and threats without delivery of property do not constitute extortion - The court emphasized that for extortion, there must be an intention to induce delivery of property due to fear. (Paras 4, 7, 10)

(B) Legal Definition of Extortion - The court reiterated that mere threats without the delivery of property do not satisfy the criteria for extortion under IPC. (Paras 4, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash an FIR alleging extortion, claiming that the complainant was threatened to deliver illegal donations, but no property was delivered. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the FIR did not establish the offence of extortion as defined under IPC, allowing the petition in part. (Paras 10, 11)

Issues: The main issue was whether the allegations in the FIR constituted extortion under IPC. (Paras 4, 7)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that for an offence of extortion to be made out, there must be a delivery of property induced by fear, which was absent in this case. (Paras 4, 8)

Result: The incorporation of Section 384 IPC in the FIR was quashed; investigation may continue under Sections 385 and 506 IPC.

Order :

FARJAND ALI, J.

1. The petitioner has sought quashing of the FIR No. 121/2018 registered at Police Station Chhoti Sadri, Pratapgarh for the offence under Sections 383, 385, 506 of the IPC.

2. The brief facts as narrated in the FIR are that complainant Ganesh Lal lodged the FIR for the allegations that the petitioner used to harass him and mount pressure to deliver illegal amount or donations to him, or else he would publish news in the newspaper about his corrupt practice and then would make the news viral on social media. The FIR also has a recital about sending a complaint by the petitioner to the Registrar, Board of Revenue Board, Rajasthan, Chief Minister of Rajasthan and copies of which were sent to the Chief Minister of Rajasthan, IG of Anti- Corruption Bureau, Rajasthan, having false allegations of his corrupt practice. 2.1 Based upon the aforementioned allegations, the investigation is being carried by the police. Hence, the Misc.Petition.

3. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the niceties of the matter.

4. After perusing the material available on record, it is necessary to first discuss the provision of extortion and how it is defined under IPC. For ready reference, Section 383 of the IPC is reproduced herein below:-

“383. Extortion.—

Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits “extortion”.

Illustrations

(a) A threatens to publish a defamatory libel concerning Z unless Z gives him money. He thus induces Z to give him money. A has committed extortion.

(b). A threatens Z that he will keep Z’s child in wrongful confinement, unless Z will sign and deliver to A a promissory note binding Z to pay certain monies to A. Z signs and delivers the note. A has committed extortion.

(c). A threatens to send club-men to plough up Z’s field unless Z will sign and deliver to B a bond binding Z under a penalty to deliver certain produce to B, and thereby induces Z to sign and deliver the bond. A has committed extortion.

(d) by putting Z in fear of grievous hurt, dishonestly induces Z to sign or affix his seal to a blank paper and deliver it to A. Z signs and delivers the paper to A. Here, as the paper so signed may be converted into a valuable security. A has committed extortion.”

A bare perusal of Section 383 of the IPC reveals that, for the offence of extortion to be made out, there must be an intention on the part of the accused to put another person in fear of injury, and as a result of such fear, the person so threatened must be dishonestly induced to deliver any property or valuable security. In the present case, it is evident from plain reading of the FIR itself that the offence of extortion is not made out, as the allegations indicate a mere threat and there is no allegation or evidence to suggest that the complainant delivered any property or valuable security to the petitioner.

5. Section 384 IPC is punishment for extortion as per which whoever commits extortion shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years or with fine or both.

6. Section 385 of the IPC is regarding putting a person in fear of injury in order to commit extortion. For ready reference, Section 385 of the IPC is reproduced herein below:-

Section 385- Putting a person in fear of injury in order to commit extortion.

Whoever, in order to the committing of extortion, puts any person in fear, or attempts to put any person in fear, of any injury, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

This provision envisages that whoever, in order to commit extortion, puts any person in fear or make an attempt to put any person in fear of any injury, shall be punished with imprison

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top