HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA
Superintendent of Police, Jaipur City, Jaipur – Appellant
Versus
Jai Lal Bairwa S/o Shri Ramji Lal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial court findings and decisions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments of the appellants and respondents. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal reasoning regarding natural justice. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. employment law on probationary dismissal. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. conclusion and order of dismissal. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
1. The present second appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2001 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Bandikui, District Dausa (for short ‘the Appellate Court’) in Regular Civil Appeal No. 07/2000, whereby the learned Appellate Court while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants/defendants affirmed the judgment dated 24.02.2000 and decree dated 29.03.2000 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bandikui (Dausa) [for short ‘the trial court’] in Civil Case No. 55/91 (19/95).
2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit before the trial court under Order 33 Rules 1 and 2 CPC in the year 1991, seeking declaration, permanent injunction, and consequential relief. It was the case of the respondent/plaintiff





Kunwar Arun Kumar v. U.P. Hill Electronics Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Kamal Nayan Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
The termination of a probationary employee requires adherence to principles of natural justice, particularly when allegations of misconduct are involved.
Probationary employees may be terminated for violating appointment terms, including misrepresenting criminal history, without requiring formal procedural safeguards.
Non-disclosure of juvenile criminal cases by candidates does not constitute concealment, and such grounds cannot invalidate employment.
Non-disclosure of a pending criminal case in employment applications must be evaluated against the nature of the charges and the context of acquittal, impacting the candidate's suitability for servic....
Pending criminal charges do not automatically disqualify an individual from government service; fair hearing and natural justice must be observed before termination.
Suppression of material information in job applications, even with subsequent acquittal, justifies termination of employment under temporary service rules, emphasizing the gravity of offenses involve....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.