Harkesh Meena Son of Ramsahay Meena vs State Of Rajasthan, through C.B.I represented By Special PP.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1980

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA
Harkesh Meena Son of Ramsahay Meena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through C.B.I represented By Special PP. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Naman Yadav, Mr. Chinmay Sharma.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Shyam Singh Yadav for the complainant.

Table of Content
1. challenge against access to complete electronic evidence. (Para 1 , 10 , 14)
2. petitioner's right to evidence and trial process. (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
3. expert witness statements on evidence authenticity. (Para 6 , 7)
4. right to fair trial encompasses access to complete evidence. (Para 17 , 18 , 23)
5. mandate for providing cloned copies of evidence. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 24)
6. final direction given to cbi regarding evidence. (Para 25 , 26)

Order :

ANAND SHARMA, J.

1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, petitioner has assailed the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 30.01.2024 passed by Special Judge, CBI No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur, and has prayed for a direction against CBI to provide exact clone copies of memory cards labelled as VR, VR- 1 & MC in different memory cards as it was recorded and provide transcription of whole recordings recorded in the above memory cards.

2. Facts in brief are that pursuant to FIR lodged against the petitioner under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, petitioner is facing trial before the Court of Special Judge CBI No. 4, Jaipur Metropolitan-I.

3. At the time of filing of charge-she