SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 556

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Bablu Pasi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rakesh Sahu for applicant; Sushri Geeta Yadav, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The applicant has filed this Misc. Criminal Case under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by order dated 25.2.2020 passed by Learned Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in S.T. No.565/2019 whereby learned Sessions Judge has rejected the application under sections 91,104 read with section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The facts necessary for disposal of this miscellaneous criminal case may briefly be stated thus :

The complainant has lodged a criminal case against the accused/applicant and the same is pending for adjudication before the Sessions Court, Jabalpur. It is alleged that the applicant has committed an offence under section 436 of the I.P.C. and made an accused on the basis of C.D. recording. The prosecution has produced the C.D. of the alleged incident. It is stated by the prosecution that entire incident has been recorded through CCTV camera and C.D. was prepared by the prosecution to prove the offence.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that due to political pressure and previous enmity, the FIR has been lodged against the applicant as previously wife of the applicant made a complaint before the S.D.M. against the present complainant. There

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top