SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2048

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SAMEER JAIN
Ramesh Chand Saini Son Of Shri Nathu Lal Saini – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary Panchayati Raj Department – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. G.S. Gouttam for Mr. R.K. Gouttam Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Girriraj Rajoria Mr. Aamir Khan Mr. Kapil Khandelwal Mr. Pankaj Jorwal
Mr. Y.K. Sharma Ms. Pragya Seth for Mr. Mahendra Shah, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tanmay Dhand Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodia with Ms. Aasha Meena & Mr. Jai Prakash Saini
Mr. Kailash Chand Sharma Mr. Aatish Jain Mr. Manvendra Singh with Mr. Himanshu
Mr. Tanveer Ahmed with Mr. Dyaram Bhaskar Mr. Kartar Singh Foujdar Mr. C.P. Sharma  Mr. Dharmendra Fageria for Mr. Mahipal Singh Kharra Mr. Nripendra  Sinsinwar Dr. Saugath Roy Mr. Sandeep Kumar Meena Mr. Dinesh Kumar Saini
Mr. Bheem Sain Bairwa Mr. Vijay Pathak Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma Ms. Anima Jain Mr. D.S. Bagadia Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola Mr. Naveen Dhuwan Ms. Sudesh Kasana Mr. Ram Dhan Choudhary Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Palia
Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat Mr. Pradeep kumar Meena for Mr. Narendra Prasad Meena Mr. Aamir Khan for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Ripu Dhawan Singh Naruka
Mr. Laxmikant Malpura Ms. Jyotsana Mr. Surendar Meel Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar Mr. Suresh Kumawat Mr. Sumer Chand Sharma Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman with
Mr. Keshav Parashar Mr. Ashish Kabra Mr. Moin Khan Ms. Suman Sharma Mr. Prashant Sharma Mr. Balkishan Saini Mr. Arvind Kumar Arora for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri Mr. Tushar Sharma with Mr. Suraj Sharma
For the Respondent: Mr. Prateek Saxena with Mr. Ashutosh Udawat Ms. Anjali Ranga Mr. Anshul Ranga Mr. Prenay Sharma for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG

Table of Content
1. factual context of recruitment case (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioners’ grievances on appointment delays (Para 4 , 6 , 11)
3. role of binding precedents in employment disputes (Para 24 , 41)
4. court's assessment of prior judgments (Para 32 , 37 , 38)
5. conclusion on dismissal of petitions (Para 44)

Judgment :

SAMEER JAIN, J.

1. In the present batch of writ petitions, the controversy which engages the attention of this Court, albeit multifaceted, is predominantly circumscribed by the challenge directed against the impugned letter dated 07.09.2022, issued by the respondent– authorities in connection with the recruitment process for the post of Lower Division Clerk (hereinafter referred to as ‘LDC’), 2013. It is alleged that by virtue of the aforesaid letter, the respondents restricted appointments to merely 4000 posts, notwithstanding the availability of approximately 19,000 vacancies under the said recruitment exercise. Inasmuch as the issues raised in all these writ petitions rest substantially upon common questions of law and fact, this Court, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, has considered it appropriate to take up S.B. Civil Writ Peti





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top