Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, SANDEEP TANEJA
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ali Taqi S/o Irtiza Hussain – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
1. At the outset, it is clarified that the present batch of special appeals arise from a similar set of facts and common issues emanating from the impugned order dated 21.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, it would be appropriate and in the interest of judicial propriety to adjudicate them analogously.
2. For the sake of convenience, D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1128/2024 is treated as the lead case in the present adjudication. The decision rendered therein shall govern and apply mutatis mutandis also to the instant D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1123/2024, D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1109/2024 and D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1105/2024.
3. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1128/2024 has been preferred by the appellants under Rule 134 of the RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT RULES , 1951, read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:
“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this appeal may kindly be allowed, the impugned order of learned Single Judge dated 21.05.2024 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13771/2023 (Dr. Mohd. Sajid vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) may
Cumulative age relaxation is impermissible under the Rajasthan Ayurvedic, Unani, Homoeopathy and Naturopathy Service Rules, as each relaxation operates independently without aggregation unless expres....
The court affirmed that special age limits for specific categories, like Ex-Servicemen, cannot be combined with general relaxations, maintaining the prescribed upper age of 50 years.
The absence of specific provision for age relaxation for specially abled candidates in the Rules, 2018, at the time of advertisement and application, led to the dismissal of the petitioner's claim fo....
The court established that amendments to recruitment rules are prospective and do not affect ongoing selection processes unless explicitly stated.
Point of law: Schedule III of the Rules of 2010 prescribes specific time schedule for determination and notification of the actual number of existing and expected vacancies in each cadre as also for ....
Where applications are called for prescribing a particular date as last date for filing applications, eligibility of candidates shall have to be judged with reference to that date and that date alone....
The discretionary power of the appointing authority in granting age relaxation and the need for uniform eligibility criteria to avoid arbitrary selections.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
