HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SANDEEP SHAH, J.
Dr. Deepak Arora, S/o. Nandlal Arora – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7662 Of 2025
Decided On : 07-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application and fir details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's prior order regarding the petition. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner asserts no offence is established. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments by respondent counsel regarding fir. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's analysis of fir investigation rights. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. guidelines for judicial interference in investigations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. conditions for fir quashing are clarified. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. definition and understanding of 'public view'. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 9. analysis on whether offence occurred in public view. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 10. court's interpretation of caste-based insults. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 11. analysis of intent and meaning of 'neech'. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 12. definition of public servant in context. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 13. public servant definitions through case law. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 14. analysis of the director's status as public servant. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 15. public funding indicates public servant status. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 16. court's finding on continuing investigation. (Para 44 , 45) |
| 17. discussion on elements of section 3(2)(va) sc/st act. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 18. comparison of factual scenarios in case law. (Para 53 , 54) |
| 19. court's conclusion on quashing fir. (Para 55 , 56) |
| 20. final order on the petition. (Para 57) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP SHAH, J.
1. Petitioner- an Associate Professor working at Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur has filed the present criminal miscellaneous petition with the following prayer:-
“A. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed to this Hon’ble Court that the present misc. petition may kindly be allowed and the FIR No.118/2025 Dated 02.09.2025 registered at P.S. Karwar, District Jodhpur City East for offences under Section 121(1) & 132 of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. & 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) & 3(2)(va) Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and all further proceedings initiated thereto may kindly be quashed and set aside.
Factual Matrix:-
2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant Ankur Gupta, Acting Registrar, IIT, Jodhpur lodged an FIR No.118/2025 registered at Police Station Karwar, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act on 02.09.2025 while alleging therein that on 02.09.2025 at around 11.30 a.m., the present petitioner was in a discussion with the Director of IIT Jodhpur, Professor Sh. Avinash Agarwal at the Director’s Office at the 2nd floor of the Western Administrative Wing (Chanakya Building) and at the relevant time Dr. Parag Deshpande, Head of Chemical Engineering Department and Dr. Neeraj Jain, Dean, Faculty Affairs were present in the office of the Director. It was alleged in the FIR that during the discussion, Dr. Deepak Arora present petitioner attempted a life threatening assault on the Director, Professor Mr. Avinash Agarwal and also physically attacked him. In retaliation and in self defence, the Director, Professor Mr. Avinash Agarwal caught both the hands of the petitioner, upon which the petitioner kicked the Director and obstructed the exit to ensure that the Director does not leave the office. It has further been alleged that due to the kick caused by the petitioner, the Director, Professor Mr. Avinash Agarwal suffered an injury on his right foot. The FIR further narrates that some other officers working under the Director came to intervene in the Director’s Office, upon which, the petitioner started assaulting them also and even abused Mr. Vivek Gautam using caste based slurs and even called him ‘neech’. The petitioner further started abusing Mr. Vivek Gautam and threatened him with dire consequences and further stated that the family members of Mr. Vivek Gautam will be killed. It was further stated in the FIR that Mr. Vivek Gautam sustained an injury on his right hand due to assault made by the petitioner. Finally the request was made for initiating appropriate proc
Swaran Singh & Ors. v. State and Anr.
Shajan Skaria v. State of Kerala
MEDCHL Chemicals & Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. Biological E. Ltd. & Ors.
Padal Venkata Rama Reddy @ Ramu v. Kovvuri Satyanarayana Reddy & Ors.
Veer Prakash Sharma v. Anil Kumar Agarwal & Anr.
Swaran Singh & Ors. v. State and Anr.
LD Healy v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Court held that incidents must occur in public view for SC/ST Act offenses, and the term 'neech' does not qualify as caste-based abuse.
(1) Insult within public view – If alleged offence takes place within four corners of wall where members of public are not present, then it cannot be said that it has taken place at a place within pu....
Sufficient evidence must link alleged acts to an intent to humiliate based on caste identity for the application of the SC/ST Act.
The misuse of the S.C./S.T. Act for personal grievances is impermissible, and allegations must substantiate a prima facie case to avoid abuse of legal processes.
The court ruled that allegations under the SC/ST Act and IPC were false and motivated by personal vendetta, emphasizing the need to prevent misuse of legal provisions.
The court ruled that for an offence under the SC/ST Act, abuse must occur in public view, which was not established, leading to quashing of proceedings.
The court clarified the interpretation of 'within public view' in the context of the Atrocities Act, holding that a place can be considered 'within public view' even if it is a private place, provide....
The court quashed proceedings under the SC/ST Act due to lack of public view in the alleged incident, emphasizing the need for specific ingredients to establish the offence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.