IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Mohd Imran Khan S/o Babu Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 445 of 2026
Decided On : 03-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seek modification of passport validity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conditions for passport issuance discussed. (Para 3) |
| 3. right to hold passport linked to personal liberty. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's decision aligned with prior rulings. (Para 5) |
| 5. court orders ten-year passport issuance. (Para 6) |
| 6. issuance of passports contingent on fair procedure. (Para 7) |
ORDER
1. The present criminal writ petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 15.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ladnun, District Deedwana, Rajasthan, in Criminal Regular Case No. 62/2019, arising out of FIR No.133/2016 registered at Police Station Ladnun, District Nagaur, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code.
1.1 By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks limited modification of the aforesaid order to the extent of permitting renewal/re-issuance of his passport bearing No. AE493286 for a period of ten years, instead of one year, along with consequential permission to travel abroad.
2. Briefly stating the facts of the case that the petitioner, an accused on bail in Criminal Regular Case No. 62/2019 arising out of FIR No.133/2016 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323 and 325 IPC, has been facing trial for the last seven years and seeks modification of the order dated 15.07.2025 whereby his passport was renewed only for one year. Aggrieved by the curtailed validity, which restricts his right to travel abroad for employment despite prior permissions granted by the trial court, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking renewal of his passport for the standard period of ten years.
3. This Court has dealt with the similar issue in the case of Balkaran Singh v. State of Rajasthan in S.B. Criminal Misc. (Pet.) No. 7824/2022 dated 21.11.2022. The relevant paragraphs of the order are being reproduced herein below:-
“It is significant to note here that the Passports Act, 1967 does not confer absolute power upon a citizen to obtain passport. Section 6(1) & (2) of the Act prescribe certain conditions/eventualities when the passport authority is required to turn down request to make an endorsement or issue passport which includes a condition when an applicant is an accused in a criminal case. Relevant extract of section 6(2) is reproduced hereinbelow:-
“(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to issue a passport or travel document for visiting any foreign country under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 5 on any one or more of the following grounds, and on no other ground, namely:—
(a) that the applicant is not a citizen of India;
(b) that the applicant may, or is likely to, engage outside India in activities prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India;
(c) that the departure of the applicant from India may, or is likely to, be detrimental to the security of India;
(d) that the presence of the applicant outside India may, or is likely to, prejudice the friendly relations of India with any foreign country;
(e) that the applicant has, at any time during the period of five years immediately preceding the date of his application, been convicted by a court in India for any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than two years;
(f) that proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a criminal court in India;
(g) that a warrant or summons for the appearance, or a warrant for the arrest, of the applicant has been issued by a court under any law for the time being in force or that an order prohibiting the departure from India of the applicant has been made by any such court;
(h) that the applicant has been repatriated and has not reimbursed the
The right to hold a passport is integral to personal liberty; arbitrary restrictions due to ongoing criminal proceedings, without conviction, are unreasonable.
The right to renew a passport is part of personal liberty and cannot be arbitrarily restricted without due process, particularly when the individual is not convicted.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.