SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 53

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, A.C.J., Baljinder Singh Sandhu, J.
Kadar Khan S/o Shri Aziz Khan - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary And Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1251 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1124 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1179 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1463 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1470 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1478 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1584 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23428 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23623 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23645 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23800 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23810 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23948 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24094 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24170 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24174 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24210 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24228 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24326 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24365 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24418 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24521 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24525 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24537 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24614 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24684 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 25014 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 25078 of 2025, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 299 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 318 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 394 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 507 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 519 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 56 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 60 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 735 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 757 of 2026, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 974 of 2026
Decided On : 28-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Aniket Tater, Mr. Ramawatar Singh, Mr. Sumer Singh Gour, Mr. Durgesh Khatri, Mr. Vikas Bijarnia, Mr. Punit Choudhary, Mr. Manish Patel, Dr. Mohit Singhvi, Mr. Khatri Vishwash Girish, Mr. Rahul Bishnoi for, Mr. Jaidev Singh, Mr. Moti Singh, Mr. A.R. Godara, Mr. Deepak Bishnoi, Mr. D.L.R. Vyas, Mr. Dinesh Chandra Mali, Mr. Ajeet Singh, Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Mr. Gorkh Singh, Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Mr. Naveen Singh
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajendra Prasad, A.G., Mr. I.R. Choudhary, AAG, Mr. Pawan Bharti, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Solanki

Judicial precedents must be respected; the court dismissed writ petitions as issues had been adjudicated previously, affirming the need for timely local body elections without infringement of rights.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Right to constitutional remedies - The petitioners filed writ petitions contesting previous judgments regarding the elections of local bodies. The court recognized that these issues have been previously adjudicated, citing specific cases such as Sunil Jangid & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and upheld by the Supreme Court. The court noted that there is no infringement of constitutional rights and emphasized the importance of timely elections. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Judicial discipline - The court adhered to precedents set by previous decisions, reinforcing the principle of judicial consistency and the necessity of respecting prior rulings. (Para 1)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners raised issues already adjudicated in previous judgments regarding the election delays of local bodies, specifically referencing decisions involving multiple connected cases. The elections have been delayed for about a year, and the State Government has committed to conducting them by April 15, 2026.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioners did not establish a case warranting interference in prior judgments and recognized the necessity of proceeding with elections to maintain governance.

Issues: Whether the petitioners' claims warranted revisiting established judgments about local body elections and whether there was any infringement of constitutional rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court maintained that the matters contested have been thoroughly considered in prior judgments and that the elections must proceed to uphold democratic processes and governance, as delaying them further was not justified.

Result: Writ petitions stand dismissed.

Table of Content
1. previous decisions guide current case. (Para 1)
2. petitions dismissed based on prior judgment. (Para 2)

ORDER :

1. The issue raised in these writ petitions is no longer res integra and already stands adjudicated by this Court at Jaipur Bench in the case of Sunil Jangid & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 988/2026 decided on 21.01.2026 along with other connected matters wherein this Court has held as under:-

“18. These writ petitions filed on behalf of the petitioners deserve to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly the issue raised by the petitioners in these writ petitions has been thoroughly considered and decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Sheela Kumari (supra), wherein specific questions were framed and answered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court which have again been raised by the petitioners in the present writ petitions and therefore, the same require no interference; secondly the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court has been further upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Villagers of Revenue village Singhania and another (supra); thirdly the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Villagers of Revenue village Singhania and another (supra) has considered the fact that there is no infringement of any constitutional or legally vested right of the petitioners and on that ground the SLP was dismissed and granted liberty to the Gram Panchayat that in case of any difficulty in its management or in providing services to the village residents, the Gram Panchayats will be at liberty to approach the competent authorities to shift the headquarter; fourthly the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Ratan Lal (supra),wherein the same issue was under challenge, the said PIL petition was dismissed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.01.2026 considering the judgment in the matter of Sheela Kumari and villagers of Singhania (both supra); lastly since the matter relates to holding the elections of Gram Panchayat, Panchayat Samities and Zila Parishad which has already been delayed for about one year, we are not inclined to disturb the process of election which is under progress and the State Government has to hold the elections upto 15.04.2026 in terms of the undertaking given by them before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

19. In view of the above, no case is made out in favour of the petitioners, hence these writ petitions stand dismissed. Copy of this order be separately placed in each connected file.”

2. In light of the aforesaid judgment, these petitions stand dismissed mutatis mutandis.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top