SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 145

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANAND SHARMA, J.
Anil Singh Son Of Shri Jay Singh – Petitioner 
Versus 
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department – Respondent 
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10871 of 2025, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11516 of 2023, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11787 of 2023, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18838 of 2023, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14245 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14901 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15532 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16185 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16601 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16643 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16777 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17170 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17341 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17385 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17386 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17454 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17535 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17795 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19350 of 2024, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 441 of 2025, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11718 of 2025, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16272 of 2025, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16344 of 2025, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17981 of 2025 
Decided On : 06-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat, Mr. M.F. Baig, Mr. Amitesh Rana, Mr. Aamir Khan For Mr. Ankit Agarwal
For the Respondent: Mr. Narendra Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Bhardwaj For Mr. Nalin, G. Narain, Mr. Ajay Khedar With Mr. Satish Kumar Khandal, Mr. Saumil Sharma For Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, Agc Mr. Surendar Meel With Ms. Manisha Yogi, Mr. Ashish Kumar For Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Mr. Amit Lubhaya With Mr. Shreyash Jain, Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda With Mr. Anshu Kanwar, Mr. Yuvraj Samant, Ms. Aditi Chorasiya, Mr. Nikhil Pal Singh, Mr. Hamir Singh Shekhawat With Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore For Mr. S.S. Naruka, Aag Mr. Manoj Sharma Ms. Pooja Sharma, Mr. Stuti Dave For Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Aag

The court clarified that the qualifications necessary for appointment as teachers in special education are governed by previous judgments and that Single Benches cannot review Division Bench interpretations.

Headnote:(A) Education Department Regulations - Qualification Criteria for Teaching Positions - The case concerns the eligibility criteria for teaching appointments, particularly around the qualifications required for candidates seeking employment as teachers in special education, following prior judgment dated 28.11.2025. (Para 1)

(B) Judicial Hierarchy - The Single Bench cannot overturn or review the decisions or interpretations made by a Division Bench. (Para 2)

Facts of the case:
Multiple writ petitions filed concerning the qualifications necessary for teaching positions in special education, specifically relating to candidates who possess a B.Ed degree.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that all candidates meeting the required qualifications should be considered for appointment as expeditiously as possible.

Issues: The key issue involved the interpretation of educational qualification requirements for teaching positions as stipulated by the RCI.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reinforced that the interpretation of guidelines related to educational qualifications should follow the previous Division Bench judgment, and Single Bench decisions cannot reassess these interpretations.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of in light of the Division Bench's judgment.

Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria for teaching positions (Para 1)
2. contention regarding interpretation of judgment (Para 2)
3. disposal of writ petitions based on consensus (Para 3)
4. maintenance of records for proceedings (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER :

ANAND SHARMA, J.

1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the issue involved in these writ petitions are squarely covered by judgment dated 28.11.2025 passed in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 214/2025 wherein, following directions have been given as under:

"8. We are, however, not in agreement with the submissions raised by the learned Senior Counsel that even a graduate who has not done B.Ed in General Education, but has done Diploma in Special Education would be eligible for appointment as Level- II. The correct interpretation of the letter issued by the RCI to the State Government dated 26.07.2024 has to be read in consonance with the earlier letter dated 10.06.2022 issued by the RCI as quoted in the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge wherein, it has been clearly specified that for the middle stage Class 6 to 8 teachers, the qualifications would be as under:

LevelsQualificationRecruitment ProcessMinimum No. of Spl. Ed. TeacherRecommended PTRRemark

Fourndational Stage (pre- school) Class 1 & 2)

Primary Level

1. D.Ed. in Special Education from a RCI approved Institute and possess a valid RCI CRR number of

Through CTET/TET/NTA Schore+Demonsteration of Class room teaching+Interview or as per the recruitment process and apted from time to time10.1 (Pupils with disabiilties enrolled and special teacher)

Availability of service of special education teacher should be mandatory even if the school has one student with disabilit y.

Preparatiion Stage (Class 3 to 5)D.El.Ed. with a recognized qualification (Certificate/Diploma*) from a RCT approved institution equivalent to D.E.d in Special Education and possess a valid CRR number. 2. Six-month training of teaching in cross disability area in inclusive education. (**)One(***)

15.1 (Pupils with disabilities enrolled and special education teacher)

Middle Stage (Class 6 to 8) Secondary Stage Class 9 to 12)

Upper Primary+Seconday+Higher Secondary

1. B.Ed in Special Education from a RCI Approved Institute and possess a valid RCI and CRR number or B.Ed with a recognize qualification (Certificate/ Diploma*) from a RCI approved institution equivalent to B.E.d in Special Education and possess a valid RCI CRR number

2. Sixmonths traininng of teaching in cross diability area in inclusive education (**)

9. Thus, what is necessary is that a person must possess a B.Ed qualification whether General or Special Education, if he posses B.Ed in Special Education, he need not further have any other requirement, however, he may be B.Ed in General plus he has recognized qualification namely Diploma or Certificate Course in Special Education for the purpose. The letter also reiterates the same, it only it reiterates that the candidate who possesses a Diploma in Education (Special Education B.Ed) would be also eligible for consideration for appointment. It does not in any manner say that the other qualifications would not be looked into. Thus, apart from D.Ed Special Education, the State would also examined whether the candidate possess B.Ed in General or not apart from being graduate.

10. We therefore, conclude that the Sate Government shall now consider all the candidates who have applied for the post who possess B.Ed in General along with Diploma in Special Education as a sufficient qualification for appointment, all such candidates would be considered according to their merit, and be given appointment as soon as possible, preferably, the exercise may be done within a period of two months henceforth.

11. In accordance with the litigation policy, we would advise the State Government to apply this judgment to all the candidates who have applied in stead of forcing them to come for further litigation before this Court, therefore, this judgment shall be applie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top