Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, RAVI CHIRANIA
Yatendra Kumar Nagori – Appellant
Versus
Special Secretary Cum Vice-Chairperson (KVS), New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of termination and complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims of false implication by the petitioner. (Para 4) |
| 3. seriousness of allegations against the petitioner. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. opportunity for defense and compliance with procedures. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. confirmation of allegations and justification for termination. (Para 9 , 11 , 13) |
| 6. nature of the order. (Para 10) |
| 7. dismissal of writ petition. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 8. guidelines regarding minor names in judgments. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 28.8.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the learned tribunal) whereby the learned tribunal has rejected the original application filed by the petitioner against the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the disciplinary authority whereby the petitioner has been terminated from the services.
2. The facts in nut shell are that initially the petitioner came to be appointed as Primary Teacher in the respondent – Kendriya Vidyala Sangthan, Jaipur Region vide appointment order dated 15.1.1990. On 6.2.2015, a complaint was lodged a
Termination of a teacher for serious misconduct towards a minor is justified when procedural fairness is upheld and the inquiry is thorough.
The court upheld the termination of a teacher for immoral conduct against a minor, emphasizing the serious nature of such allegations and adherence to disciplinary procedures.
The court held that the Tribunal erred in concluding that the respondent's actions did not amount to sexual misbehaviour, affirming the appropriateness of termination under Article 81(B) of the Educa....
The court upheld the termination of a teacher for misconduct involving indecent behavior towards a minor, emphasizing that due process was satisfied through a preliminary inquiry per Article 81(B) of....
Disciplinary termination based on invalid Internal Committee lacking NGO member under POSH Act, 2013, plus criminal acquittal on identical facts, vitiates proceedings; quashing with continuity of ser....
Summary domestic inquiry under special notification valid for teacher sexual misconduct cases protecting girl students; natural justice met via document perusal and cross-examination opportunity; bia....
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to established procedures to ensure fairness, especially in serious allegations of moral turpitude.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
