Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
REKHA BORANA
Urban Improvement Trust, through its Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Girdhari, S/o. Shri Kumbha Ram, through his LRs. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
REKHA BORANA, J.
1. The present writ petitions arise out of common questions of law and facts and hence, were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under :
(i) A revenue suit for declaration of khatedari rights under Sections 88 and 188 of the RAJASTHAN LAND REVENUE ACT ,1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1956’) was filed by one Girdhari on 17.01.1983 qua Khasra Nos.83, 104 & 108 of Village Chopasani Jagir, District Jodhpur. In the said suit, it was pleaded by Girdhari that he, along with his brother Bhera Ram were the cultivators of the land since years and after death of Bhera Ram, Girdhari was the sole cultivator of the land. It was also averred that notice under Section 91 of the Act of 1956 has been served upon him which deserves to be set aside and the land in question deserves to be declared to be of his khatedari. The suit as preferred by Girdhari was dismissed on 10.08.1989 by the Additional Collector, Jodhpur.
(ii) An appeal against the said order was preferred before the Revenue Appellate Authority (RAA). In the said appeal, an application under Order 1 Rule 10, CPC was preferred by the then
A party's acceptance of prior court decisions and subsequent actions create estoppel, preventing challenges to those decisions based on conduct and acquiescence.
The court established that khatedari rights must be respected and that revenue authorities must maintain accurate records without unjustified alterations.
Jurisdiction to declare khatedari rights is exclusively with Revenue Courts; Civil Courts can only grant consequential reliefs after such determination.
Possession established through reclamation under the C.N.T. Act is valid if supported by evidence of landlord consent, and findings from criminal proceedings do not bind civil courts.
A recorded tenant's consent is essential for an unrecorded co-tenant to acquire Bhumidhari rights; absence of such consent invalidates claims to ownership.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
