SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2623

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Mahaveer Singh S/o Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal Nos. 287, 512 of 1993
Decided On : 15-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Khushi Sharma, P.S. Champawat
For the Respondents: S.S. Rathore, Suresh Kumbhat

The conviction for assault under Section 324 IPC was upheld due to sufficient evidence, while acquittal of others was justified as evidence showed no intent to kill.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 148, 307, and 324 - Acquittal and conviction of accused - Appellants convicted under Section 324 for inflicting injuries with a knife during an assault - Conviction affirmed but sentence modified due to the long pendency of the case and the personal circumstances of the accused (Paras 1, 9, 10).

(B) Criminal Appeals - The appeal was against the acquittal of some accused and the conviction of others - The court found ample evidence for conviction under Section 324 but dismissed the appeal for acquittal due to lack of intent to kill (Paras 8, 10).

Facts of the case:
On 27.03.1989, victim Shiv Kumar was assaulted by the accused-appellants with knives and other weapons, leading to his injuries. The prosecution's case relied on the testimony of the injured witness, but the defense argued contradictions and inconsistencies.

Findings of Court:
The conviction under Section 324 was upheld, but the sentence was reduced to the time already served.

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in acquitting some accused and the nature of intent behind the assault.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the injuries were not inflicted with an intent to kill, but were rather intended to cause injury.

Result: The appeal by the accused-appellants was partly allowed with a modified sentence, while the State's appeal was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of appeals arising from trial court judgment (Para 1 , 2)
2. procedural notes and final orders regarding appeals (Para 3 , 7 , 11)
3. details of the incident and injuries sustained by victim (Para 4)
4. arguments regarding the validity of witness testimonies (Para 5 , 6)
5. court's assessment of evidence and conviction justification (Para 8)
6. modification of sentence based on case duration and context (Para 9)
7. court's decision on the state's appeal against acquittal (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

FARJAND ALI, J.

1. These two appeals arise out of the same judgment dated 04.08.1993 passed by the learend Sessions Judge, Jalore in Sessions Case No.3/1990, whereby accused Pooran Singh, Jaswant Singh, Balveer Singh, Shambhoo Singh, Mahaveer Singh and Bhanwar Singh have been acquitted from the charges under Sections 148 and 307 read with section 149 of the IPC , however, accused Mahaveer Singh, Balveer Singh and Shambhoo singh have been convicted for the offence under Section 324 of the and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of three months and to pay a fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of fine, they would have to undergo simploe imprisonment of 15 days.

2. While Appeal No.287/1993 has been preferred by the appellants Mahaveer Singh, Shambhoo Singh and Balveer Singh being aggrieved by their conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 324 of the IPC , the State Appeal bearing No.512/1993 has been preferred against acquittal of the accused persons from the charges under Sections 148 and 307 read with section 149 of the .

3. On 17.07.2025, when the matter was listed before the court, no one appeared on behalf of the accused-appellants even in the second round and therefore, Ms. Khushi Sharma, Advocate, was appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the court in S.B. Criminal Appeal No.287/1993. When the matter was again listed on 18.07.2025 for hearing, learned counsel Mr. P.S. Champawat appeared on behalf of the appellants. Both the counsel Ms. Khushi Sharma and Ms. P.S. Champawat were allowed to argue the appeal jointly on behalf of the accused-appellants.

4. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that on 27.03.1989, statement of injured Shiv Kumar was recorded by the police officer at Government Hespital, Jalore in which he stated that on 27.03.1989 at about 11.00 a.m. while he was going to his shap situated at Bus Stand, Jalore, Narpat the owner af the O.K. Guest House called him so he want to him and while he was talking with Narpat at the Bus stand 5-6 boys were standing and were pointing him. He told Narpat that these persens may beat him. Narpat assured that they will not beat him here and when he was returning, near Nakada Sweet Home, Mahaveer Singh, Balveer Singh and Shambhu Singh, who are appellants herein, and 3 other accused persens came there. The three accused appellants were having knife in their hands and the other accused persens were empty handed. Upen seeing them, he entered the O.K. Guest House, but Balveer Singh, Mahaveer Singh and Shambhu Singh pulled him out and inflicted knife blows in his stomach. Mahaveer Singh's brother, who was having Dheti, inflicted a blow on his head and the other accused persens inflicted fist blows on his eyes. He fell down, whereafter the accused persens started beating him with fists and kicks, whereafter, he became unconscious. When he regained his consciousness, Narpat told him that on his shouting, the accused persens ran away. He had further narrated that he could identify the remaining three accused persons, if they were shown to him. It was alleged that these accused persons had inflicted injuries with an intention to kill him. Upon this statement, C.R. No.78/1989 for the offences under Sections 147 , 148, 307, 324, 323, 341 & 149 I.P.C. was registered at the Police Station Jalore. After usual investigation, the police filed a charge-sheet against thre accused persons before the concerned Magistrate, from where the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top