SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 229

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
Khusiram Alias Khushi S/o Shri Ramkishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6163 of 2026
Decided On : 01-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Swapnil Singh Patel
For the Respondent: Vijay Singh Yadav

When an investigation is complete and the accused has been in custody for a significant period, bail may be granted in cases involving recovery from unattended vehicles where direct possession is not established, provided the applicant complies with conditions to ensure trial attendance and non-interference with evidence.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 8/15 - Bail application - Recovery of contraband from unattended vehicle - Accused not in physical possession - Investigation complete - Custodial period - Grant of bail - Conditions imposed. (Paras 1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case involving the recovery of contraband from an unattended and unlocked vehicle. The applicant contended that he was not present at the scene, the vehicle was not in his exclusive possession, and he had been falsely implicated. It was further submitted that the recovered quantity was below the commercial threshold and that the applicant had been acquitted or had cases withdrawn in previous criminal proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court noted that the investigation was complete and the applicant had been in custody for a significant period. Given that the trial would take time and considering the circumstances of the recovery from an unattended vehicle, the court deemed it appropriate to grant bail.

Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to bail given the nature of the recovery, the lack of direct possession, and the status of the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the investigation is complete, the accused has been in custody for a sufficient duration, and the recovery was made from an unattended vehicle without direct evidence of possession, the court may exercise its discretion to grant bail, provided the applicant adheres to specified conditions to ensure trial participation and prevent tampering with evidence.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. factual context of the alleged offense, investigation status, and antecedents of the accused. (Para 1 , 6 , 7)
2. assessment of rival contentions regarding investigation, recovery procedures, and prior acquittals. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. judicial discretion in granting conditional bail based on current custody status and circumstances. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

ORDER :

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Khusiram @ Khushi S/o Shri Ramkishan, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.60/2026 dated 23.03.2026 registered at P.S. Akbarpur, District - Alwar, for the offence under Sections 8/15 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the police has recovered 9 kg 3 gram of poppy straw from an unattended vehicle allegedly owned by the petitioner. He further submitted that the admitted facts clearly indicate that at the time of proceedings, the vehicle was not locked and the police opened the vehicle without the help of any key. He further submitted that the petitioner was neither present with the vehicle nor the vehicle was in exclusive possession of the petitioner. He further submitted that three cases were allegedly registered against the petitioner, out of which one case relating to the Excise Act was already withdrawn, whereas in another case arising out of FIR No. 52/2020, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa, the petitioner has been acquitted. He has placed on record a copy of judgment dated 07.03.2026. He further submitted that the recovered quantity is far less than the commercial quantity.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He further submitted that the bail application of present petitioner was rightly dismissed.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.

6. On 23.03.2026, SHO Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar checked and searched a Swift car which was found in an unlocked condition. On search, 9 kg 3 gram opium poppy straw (crushed capsules of opium residue) were recovered in two different packets. After recovery proceedings, FIR No. 60/2026 was registered at Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar. The petitioner-accused was arrested on 10.04.2026 and is currently in custody.

7. Total three criminal cases were registered against the petitioner, out of which the petitioner was acquitted in Sessions Case No. 33/2022 arising out of FIR No. 52/2020, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for petitioner has made a statement that the case relating to FIR No. 426/2015, Police Station Mala Khera, District Alwar has already been withdrawn.

8. In the present case, no recovery has been effected in the presence of the petitioner, though the recovery was effected from a vehicle lying unattended and in an unlocked condition which allegedly belonged to the present petitioner.

9. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused.

10. Thus,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top