IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
Khusiram Alias Khushi S/o Shri Ramkishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6163 of 2026
Decided On : 01-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context of the alleged offense, investigation status, and antecedents of the accused. (Para 1 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. assessment of rival contentions regarding investigation, recovery procedures, and prior acquittals. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial discretion in granting conditional bail based on current custody status and circumstances. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Khusiram @ Khushi S/o Shri Ramkishan, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.60/2026 dated 23.03.2026 registered at P.S. Akbarpur, District - Alwar, for the offence under Sections 8/15 of NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the police has recovered 9 kg 3 gram of poppy straw from an unattended vehicle allegedly owned by the petitioner. He further submitted that the admitted facts clearly indicate that at the time of proceedings, the vehicle was not locked and the police opened the vehicle without the help of any key. He further submitted that the petitioner was neither present with the vehicle nor the vehicle was in exclusive possession of the petitioner. He further submitted that three cases were allegedly registered against the petitioner, out of which one case relating to the Excise Act was already withdrawn, whereas in another case arising out of FIR No. 52/2020, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa, the petitioner has been acquitted. He has placed on record a copy of judgment dated 07.03.2026. He further submitted that the recovered quantity is far less than the commercial quantity.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He further submitted that the bail application of present petitioner was rightly dismissed.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.
6. On 23.03.2026, SHO Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar checked and searched a Swift car which was found in an unlocked condition. On search, 9 kg 3 gram opium poppy straw (crushed capsules of opium residue) were recovered in two different packets. After recovery proceedings, FIR No. 60/2026 was registered at Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar. The petitioner-accused was arrested on 10.04.2026 and is currently in custody.
7. Total three criminal cases were registered against the petitioner, out of which the petitioner was acquitted in Sessions Case No. 33/2022 arising out of FIR No. 52/2020, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for petitioner has made a statement that the case relating to FIR No. 426/2015, Police Station Mala Khera, District Alwar has already been withdrawn.
8. In the present case, no recovery has been effected in the presence of the petitioner, though the recovery was effected from a vehicle lying unattended and in an unlocked condition which allegedly belonged to the present petitioner.
9. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused.
10. Thus,
When an investigation is complete and the accused has been in custody for a significant period, bail may be granted in cases involving recovery from unattended vehicles where direct possession is not....
In cases involving narcotics, where the investigation is complete, the recovered quantity is less than commercial, and there is no evidence of habitual involvement in illicit trade, the court may exe....
Bail may be granted when the investigation is complete, the accused is no longer required for custodial interrogation, and the trial is likely to be protracted, provided the court is satisfied that t....
Bail may be granted in cases involving non-commercial quantities of contraband when the investigation is complete, the accused is no longer required for custodial interrogation, and the trial is expe....
In cases involving the cultivation of poppy plants, the stringent bail conditions under the relevant narcotics statute are not attracted. Where the investigation is complete and the accused is no lon....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the presumption of innocence, the need to secure the accused's appearance at trial, and the larger interests of the public or the State influenc....
Confessional statements under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act are inadmissible, and lack of evidence warrants bail under NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.