IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
Zakir Ali S/o Siddik Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5710 of 2026
Decided On : 01-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of incident, recovery details, and criminal antecedents. (Para 1 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments concerning bail eligibility and evidentiary merits. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. procedural record of hearing and perusal of materials. (Para 5) |
| 4. judicial discretion for granting bail based on case merit. (Para 8) |
| 5. operative order granting bail with specific binding conditions. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Zakir Ali S/o Siddik Ali seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.73/2026 dated 23.03.2026 registered at P.S. Khanpur, District - Jhalawar, for the offence under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 30 of NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per report, recovery was effected from Om Prakash and not from the present petitioner. He also submits that the total recovery is 1.355 kg of ganja and same is little more than of small quantity but quite less than commercial quantity. He further submits that four other criminal cases were registered against the petitioner but three of them are under IPC and one of them is of RPGO. He also submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner for regularly indulging in sale and purchase of narcotics and invocation of Section 30 of NDPS Act is not attracted in the instant case.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.
6. On 23.03.2026, Police has intercepted Om Prakash and Zakir Ali, while they were travelling on motorcycle and recovered 1.355 kg of ganja, along with cash cash. An FIR No.73/2026 was registered at PS Khanpur, District Jhalawar under Sections, 8/20, 29, 30 of NDPS Act.
7. Four criminal cases were registered against the petitioner and out of which one was disposed whereas three relating to IPC are pending before the Courts. The recovered quantity is less than commercial.
8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused.
9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant-accused Zakir Ali S/o Siddik Ali, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court.
(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled.
10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.
In cases involving narcotics, where the investigation is complete, the recovered quantity is less than commercial, and there is no evidence of habitual involvement in illicit trade, the court may exe....
Bail may be granted in cases involving non-commercial quantities of contraband when the investigation is complete, the accused is no longer required for custodial interrogation, and the trial is expe....
When an investigation is complete and the accused has been in custody for a significant period, bail may be granted in cases involving recovery from unattended vehicles where direct possession is not....
Bail may be granted when the investigation is complete, the accused has been in custody for a significant period, and the trial is likely to be delayed, provided that the court does not express a fin....
Bail granted based on lack of criminal antecedents and evidence supporting continued detention.
Strict adherence to the provisions of the NDPS Act is mandatory for granting bail, especially concerning commercial quantities of narcotics, as reiterated by the court's findings.
Search and seizer of ganja - Grant of Bail - Nature and gravity of offence and further considering the quantity of ganja, which is more than a small quantity but less than commercial quantity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.