SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 225

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
Zakir Ali S/o Siddik Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5710 of 2026
Decided On : 01-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ajay Singh Yadhuvanshi
For the Respondent: Vijay Singh Yadav

In cases involving narcotics, where the investigation is complete, the recovered quantity is less than commercial, and there is no evidence of habitual involvement in illicit trade, the court may exercise its discretion to grant bail, subject to conditions ensuring the accused's presence and non-repetition of offences.

Headnote:(A) Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 29 and 30 - Bail application - Recovery of contraband - Quantity recovered being less than commercial quantity - Investigation complete - Accused in custody for significant duration - No evidence of regular involvement in sale and purchase of narcotics - Bail granted subject to conditions. (Paras 3, 6, 7, 8)

(B) Bail - Grant of - Considerations - Court to consider nature of allegations, stage of investigation, and quantity of contraband - Where investigation is complete and recovered quantity is less than commercial, bail may be granted without expressing opinion on merits. (Paras 2, 8)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was apprehended while travelling on a vehicle, and a quantity of contraband was recovered from the possession of a co-accused. The applicant sought bail, contending that the recovery was not from his personal possession, the quantity was less than commercial, and the investigation was complete. The prosecution opposed the application, citing the gravity of the offence and the applicant's prior criminal record.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the investigation was complete, the applicant had been in custody for a sufficient period, and the recovered quantity was below the commercial threshold. Furthermore, there was no evidence suggesting the applicant was regularly involved in the illicit trade of narcotics.

Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering the quantity of contraband recovered, the status of the investigation, and the applicant's prior criminal history.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that since the investigation was complete, the recovered quantity was less than commercial, and the applicant had been in custody for a reasonable time, the applicant should be released on bail, provided he complies with specific conditions to ensure his presence and prevent further criminal activity.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. establishment of incident, recovery details, and criminal antecedents. (Para 1 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments concerning bail eligibility and evidentiary merits. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. procedural record of hearing and perusal of materials. (Para 5)
4. judicial discretion for granting bail based on case merit. (Para 8)
5. operative order granting bail with specific binding conditions. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER :

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Zakir Ali S/o Siddik Ali seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.73/2026 dated 23.03.2026 registered at P.S. Khanpur, District - Jhalawar, for the offence under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 30 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per report, recovery was effected from Om Prakash and not from the present petitioner. He also submits that the total recovery is 1.355 kg of ganja and same is little more than of small quantity but quite less than commercial quantity. He further submits that four other criminal cases were registered against the petitioner but three of them are under IPC and one of them is of RPGO. He also submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner for regularly indulging in sale and purchase of narcotics and invocation of Section 30 of NDPS Act is not attracted in the instant case.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.

6. On 23.03.2026, Police has intercepted Om Prakash and Zakir Ali, while they were travelling on motorcycle and recovered 1.355 kg of ganja, along with cash cash. An FIR No.73/2026 was registered at PS Khanpur, District Jhalawar under Sections, 8/20, 29, 30 of NDPS Act.

7. Four criminal cases were registered against the petitioner and out of which one was disposed whereas three relating to IPC are pending before the Courts. The recovered quantity is less than commercial.

8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused.

9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant-accused Zakir Ali S/o Siddik Ali, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.

(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.

(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court.

(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled.

10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top