HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SAMEER JAIN, J.
Kaushal Kumar, S/o. Mukesh Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4379 of 2026
Decided On : 23-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context for bail applications. (Para 1) |
| 2. conflicting arguments concerning fir delay and parity. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. granting bail based on parity and evidentiary delay. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER :
SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 03/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Section 380 of IPC and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of IPC dismissed the bail application before it.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that FIR in the instant matter is registered with a delay of approximately 13 days. It is submitted that the instant matter pertains to theft of mobile phones from the shop, and that the co- accused have already been enlarged on bail. It is further submitted that the recovery of the stolen items has taken place from the co-accused. It is submitted that the applicant is ready to abide by the conditions, if any, imposed by this Court while granting the concession of bail and is also willing to join the investigation as and when directed.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application.
4. Having heard the contentions made by the counsel representing both the parties, upon a perusal of the material available on record and taking note of the fact that that FIR in the instant matter is registered with a delay of approximately 13 days; that the instant matter pertains to theft of mobile phones from the shop, and that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail; that the recovery of the stolen items has taken place from the co-accused; this Court is inclined to allow the anticipatory bail application.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur in F.I.R. No. 03/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Kaushal Kumar S/o Mukesh Kumar, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station. Withal, following conditions are also imposed upon the applicant:-
(i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and
(iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when custodial investigation is not necessary and the accused are willing to cooperate with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the petitioner demonstrates willingness to cooperate with the investigation and the nature of evidence does not necessitate custodial interrogation.
The court granted anticipatory bail on the grounds of false implication and lack of necessity for custodial investigation, emphasizing personal liberty.
The court grants anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations and the accused's willingness to cooperate, emphasizing that custodial investigation is unnecessary when offences are triable by ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.