Order :

1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 48/2025 registered at Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The petitioner has been solely implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statement of other co-accused. Recovery mobile phones, sim cards and ATM cards etc. have already been effected from the possession of other co-accused. The petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation. Custodial investigation of the accused-petitioner is not required. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application.

4. I have considered the overall allegations levelled in the FIR and contentions made by the counsel for the parties.

5. Lookin