SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(HP) 25

DEEPAK GUPTA, V.K.GUPTA
RAVINDER BALORIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, M/s. S.D. Vasudeva, Vinay Kuthiala, Javed Khan, Arvind Sharma, Ms. Meenakshi, M/s. KB. Khajuria, N.D. Sharma, V.K. Verma, Lalit Sharma, K.S. Thakur, Sanjay Gandhi, Neel Kamal Sood, N.K. Thakur, R.S. Kanwar, Dibender Ghosh, Onkar Jairath, Rahul Chopra, Neeraj K. Sharma, Rajesh Kumar, Narender Sharma, N.K. Tomar, T.S. Chauhan,}. Thakur, R.R. Rahi, Ramesh Thakur, J.L. Bhardwaj, Sandeep Kaushik, Hamender Chandel, Shashi Kant, Jagdish Thakur, R.R Thakur, K.D.Shreedhar, P.P. Chauhan, Rakesh Jaswal, Deepak Kaushl, Rahul Mahajan, Amand Sood, Ms. Archana Dutt, Ms, Ranjana Parmar, M/s. Romesh Verma, Aman Sood, Anup Rattan, Mukesh Kumar, Sanjeev Kuthiala, K,D. Sharma, Ajay Sharma, R.S. Gautam, Pt. Om Parkash Sharma, Rajnish Maniktala, R. Kant Sharma, Bhuvnesh Sharma, Neel Kamal Sharma, Raman Sethi, Vishal Panzvar, Suneet Goel, Dinesh Batt, N.KSood, N.K. Gupta, G.R. Palsara, Ramakant Sharma, M.L. Sharma, Vivek Thakur, R.D. Kaundal and Nand Lal Chauhan, counsel for the petitioners; Mr. M.S. Chandel, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate, General, for the respondents:State; Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent H.P. Board of School Education; Mr.Rajiv Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Surinder Sharma and M/s. Bitnal Gupta, Anuj Nag, Sanjay Jaswal, P.C. Sharma, Ajay Mohan Goel, Lokinder Thakur and Surinder Saklani, Advocates, for the applicants/respondents.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Gupta, J. - This bunch of petitions is directed against the selections made by the respondents-State for admission to Junior Basic Training (for short: JBT) Course. The respondent No. 1 Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education issued an advertisement on 20th January, 2004 inviting applications for entrance test to the JBT course. On the basis of this entrance test, 1800 successful candidates were to be granted admission in various institutions all over the State. In this advertisement, the seats were distributed district-wise. The advertisement also prescribed reservations for various categories. The essential educational qualification for appearing in the test was 10+2 or equivalent. As per the general rules/guidelines, merit was to be prepared district-wise/category-wise by the board and the candidates were to be interviewed by the Selection Committee(s) at the Sub Divisional Headquarters. The general rule/guideline No. 5 of the advertisement provides that JBT training does not guarantee government job(s) after completion of the training. Condition No. 17 of General Rules/Guidelines for JBT Entrance Test reads as under:— “17. Question Paper.—There shall be one qu







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top