Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.

The appellants are the proforma defendants and have come up in appeal against the judgment and decree dated 6.12.2007 passed by learned District Judge (F), Shimla in Civil Appeal No. 68-S/13 of 2005/04.

2. The facts as necessary for the adjudication of the case are that one Udi Ram son of late Sh. Handu at the time of his death was succeeded by his four sons namely Het Ram, Jagat Ram, Mast Ram and Thapi. Het Ram had son proforma defendant No.7 Anokhi Ram and Mohi Ram, plaintiff, Jagat Ram had widow Mathi, Mast Ram had sons Mehar Singh, defendant No.1 and Dharam Singh Defendant No.2, Vidya Devi, daughter, defendant No.3, Thapi had sons Med Ram, defendant No.4 and daughter defendant No.5 Smt. Kalawati maintained that Udi Ram was owner in possession of landed property situated at Mauja Suin, Kogi, Pateog and Mauja Majhiar, Tehsil and Distt. Shimla, H.P. The details of the property was given in para No.4(1) of the plaint. The details of property had also been given which was situated in Suin Kogi. The property situated at Pateog (hereinafter referred to as the suit property), maintained that during his life time, late Sh.Udi Ram himself effected fami