SANDEEP SHARMA
Amar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
1. In the year, 1988, respondent No.1, advertised three posts of Regional Manager to be filled up by way of direct recruitment in consonance with R&P Rules. Out of aforesaid three posts, two were meant for General Category and one for Scheduled Caste category. Petitioner being fully qualified, also applied alongwith other eligible candidates and respondent-corporation, having found him eligible though called him for interview on 11.1.1989, but fact remains that he was not selected against the post in question i.e. Regional Manager. Though petitioner had applied against the one post reserved for Scheduled Caste category, but since he was not found fit, he was not offered appointment against the post of Regional Manager, reserved for SC category, whereas respondents No. 2 and 3 were declared selected against two posts of Regional Manager, falling in the share of General Category. It also emerges from the record that though respondent-department did not find the petitioner fit for post of Regional Manager, but offered him lower post of Assistant Manager (now Traffic Manager) on 30.6.1989. Petitioner accepted the aforesaid offer and joined against the post o
Ramesh Chand Sharma v. Udham Singh Kamal
B.S. Bajwa and another vs. State of Punjab and others
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others vs. T.T. Murali Babu
Ajeet Singh Januja v. State of Panjab
R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab AIR 1995 SC 1371
H.S. Vankani and Ors. V. State of Gujarat and Ors
Union of India and Another v. S.K. Goel and Others (2007) 14 SCC 641
T.R. Kapoor v. State of Haryana (1989) 4 SCC 71, Bimlesh Tanwar v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.